Otherwise I can't see anything better than changing the time
signature with "rebar music" checked. The problem with this method
is that all the measure-attached stuff (expressions, smart shapes,
text) will now be in the wrong place, so if you have a lot of
measure-attached elements you might s
If you don't want to change the layout at all, you will get split 6/4
measures unless there is an even number of 3/4 measures in each
system. If this is not a problem for you, you could just hide
alternate barlines and use a different time signature for display. Of
course this will mean that ea
At 8:29 AM 02/01/03, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
>>> A client has changed his mind and now wants a section in 6/4 which I already
>>> did in 3/4. What is the best way to change this without loosing too much of
>>> the layout etc?
>
>No, sorry, I was being unclear. The note values are not supposed to c
On 01.02.2003 7:24 Uhr, Giuliano Forghieri wrote
> At 00.30 01/02/2003 +0100, you wrote:
>> A client has changed his mind and now wants a section in 6/4 which I already
>> did in 3/4. What is the best way to change this without loosing too much of
>> the layout etc?
>
> The steps are easy:
>
> 1
A client has changed his mind and now wants a section in 6/4 which I already
did in 3/4. What is the best way to change this without loosing too much of
the layout etc?
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
___
