John Bell wrote:
>
> >
> >>OK, I must have missed the news on this one. But Queen Elizabeth II
> >>is *still* listed as chief of state. I got a minor surprise to read
> >>that Canada's chief of state is still HRH (represented by Governor
> >>General Adrienne Clarkson).
> >
> >Even more surprising
On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 06:05 PM, John Bell wrote:
>>> OK, I must have missed the news on this one. But Queen
>>> Elizabeth II is *still* listed as chief of state. I got a
>>> minor surprise to read that Canada's chief of state is still
>>> HRH (represented by Governor General Adrienne
At 04:33 pm -0700 11.07.2002, Philip Aker wrote:
>On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 02:17 PM, Peter Castine wrote:
>
>>OK, I must have missed the news on this one. But Queen Elizabeth II
>>is *still* listed as chief of state. I got a minor surprise to read
>>that Canada's chief of state is still
On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 02:17 PM, Peter Castine wrote:
> OK, I must have missed the news on this one. But Queen
> Elizabeth II is *still* listed as chief of state. I got a minor
> surprise to read that Canada's chief of state is still HRH
> (represented by Governor General Adrienne Cla
>Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:56:03 -0400
>From: "David H. Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [Finale] Re: The "S" word again
>
>I thought Australia had voted to continue to recognize the British
>monarch as their monarch also. Am I remembering things wrong? Was it
>maybe New Zealand?
>
>M
