On 14 Nov 2002 at 22:48, Roving Rowes wrote:
> I'm with Phil on this one. If I'm in a word processor (WordPerfect, MS
> Word, even old WordStar, take your pick) and I do a merge document, the
> program combines the text with the fields from the database and
> automatically formats it, does all it
At 7:34 am -0800 11/14/02, Robert Patterson wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 07:25:08 -0800 (PST), Andrew Stiller wrote:
An order of magnitude means a factor of 10.
I hate to be technical, but an order of magnitude means a factor of
X, where X is any number you choose (including "real" & "imagina
Roving Rowes writes:
> And now for an entirely different question: is there a way to get the
> various voices in a score to play back only on the left side or right side?
Pan the staves. (Make sure the staves are on different channels.)
Best regards,
Jari Williamsson
ICQ #: 78036563
ot a MIDI instrument.) Thanks.
Norm
- Original Message - From: "David W. Fenton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:54:52 -0500
Subject: Re: [Finale] Re: Paul McCartney (Finale is "easy"?)
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 13 Nov
On Thursday, Nov 14, 2002, at 06:15 US/Pacific, Andrew Stiller wrote:
David W. Fenton:
[it] is simply not even close to fair to compare a Finale document to
a word processing document. There are several orders of magnitude of
differences in complexity between the two.
An order of magnitude
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 07:25:08 -0800 (PST), Andrew Stiller wrote:
> An order of magnitude means a factor of 10.
I hate to be technical, but an order of magnitude means a factor of X, where X
is any number you choose (including "real" & "imaginary" numbers). FWIW: I just
verified this with my Webste
David W. Fenton:
[it] is simply not even close
to fair to compare a Finale document to a word processing document.
There are several orders of magnitude of differences in complexity
between the two.
An order of magnitude means a factor of 10. Is word processing really
hundreds or thousands of
On 13 Nov 2002 at 9:41, Phil Shaw wrote:
> I contrast this Finale experience with any
> word processor: after I enter a text document,
> I can simply "Print", and get an acceptable
> copy. If I do the same with Finale, without
> the final tweaking and editing, I get a
> wretched unreadable copy,
OK, if the subject is the ease of use of Finale
I've got to weigh in.
I just finished (I hope I hope) a project where
I transcribed a bunch (29) of jazz solos. Entering
the music into Finale is (for me) easy and
convenient. I like it I like it. But. I
just finished an editing cycle, incorpor
