Re: [Finale] Shortening secondary beam

2004-01-28 Thread Owain Sutton
Apologies for the slight hijack...but thanks for pointing out the option you describe, it's there on PC 2k3. It's what I wanted for one particular case in something I'm copying, but it also alters a huge number of other beamings. In particular, 16th-note tuplets which are 'note-rest-note' tak

Re: [Finale] Shortening secondary beam

2004-01-28 Thread Mark D Lew
On Jan 28, 2004, at 1:01 PM, d. collins wrote: I have an 8th, followed by a 16th rest, and then a 16th, beamed together. The secondary beam over the last 16th is too long. How can I shorten it? I would like to get the same thing I get with a dotted 8th followed by a 16th. Sounds to me like you

Re: [Finale] Shortening secondary beam

2004-01-28 Thread John Bell
At 10:01 pm +0100 28.01.2004, d. collins wrote: I have an 8th, followed by a 16th rest, and then a 16th, beamed together. The secondary beam over the last 16th is too long. How can I shorten it? I would like to get the same thing I get with a dotted 8th followed by a 16th. You could write a dot