And so it came to pass that David Froom spake:
Tapping the collective wisdom of the group:
Do any of you have experience with the software package called "Reason"?
This is a virtual synthesizer/sample-player/sample-editor/processor.
We run a studio in our K-12 school in Sydney. Reason is easi
>
> Digital Performer seems to be more-or-less standard in the pop/studio
> world. I learned on Cubase, so I have more of an affinity for it than
> any other sequencer, plus I know about its warts. I heard a lot about
> Logic's supposed easy interface, but it never seemed particularly
> easy to me
At 8:06 AM +1100 11/20/02, Matthew Hindson wrote:
> Also, could someone comment on the virtues of Logic or Cubase as opposed
to
Performer (plain Performer or Digital Performer? My interest, as a
teacher
and user, is in more-or-less pure MIDI sequencing (I use Spark,
SoundDesignerII, and Pr
> Also, could someone comment on the virtues of Logic or Cubase as opposed
to
> Performer (plain Performer or Digital Performer? My interest, as a
teacher
> and user, is in more-or-less pure MIDI sequencing (I use Spark,
> SoundDesignerII, and ProTools for digital editing).
A few years ago I swit
One of the places to find out good information about Digital
Performer is at this bulletin board:
http://www.unicornation.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi
Recently I saw much discussion about Reason and DP. The level of
expertise on this board is high although not quite as lofty or wide
ranging as this
Tapping the collective wisdom of the group:
Do any of you have experience with the software package called "Reason"?
This is a virtual synthesizer/sample-player/sample-editor/processor.
Also, could someone comment on the virtues of Logic or Cubase as opposed to
Performer (plain Performer or Digit
