From: "Raymond Horton"
It's really very simple. In 4/4 time, use dotted quarters on beats one and
three, but not on beat two.
Yes and Finale (version 2k3) will only change the dotted quarter where
there really are dis
On 19.02.2004 18:13 Uhr, David W. Fenton wrote
> As I said the before, the problem here is precisely the same as we
> have with beaming. For beaming we have the method available to us of
> grouping beams of 8ths in 4's in 4/4. For Finale to really handle 4/4
> properly, it would need the same conv
'markante einschnitte' ("distinctive divisions") could mean 'beats', but it
could also mean 'strong beats' (one and three).
Ray
- Original Message -
From: Ole Buck
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Fi
From: Johannes Gebauer
Sorry, but this is not a very accurate translation, there is actually
absolutely nothing about beats there. This is how not to translate if you
want to make a point.Sure, 'markante einschnitte' is not 'beats' but rather 'distinctive divisions' (of a measure) and I would n
On 19 Feb 2004 at 10:57, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
> David said
> there were exceptions for 4/4, 4/2 and to a lesser extend for 3/4.
I did not mention 4/2. I said 2/4.
All the meters where the half not is easily understood as a note
value allow, by convention, the dotted quarter plus eighth, by
It's really very simple. In 4/4 time, use dotted quarters on beats one and
three, but not on beat two.
When I asked my comp teacher, way back in undergrad, why dotted quarters
were OK in 4/4, he said "Because they're easy!"
(He was quite a stickler, too. Because of him, I still cringe whenever
On 19.02.2004 9:27 Uhr, Ole Buck wrote
> Hinsictlich der Schreibweise ist zu bemerken, dass die Zusammenziehung von
> Werten über markante Einschnitte hinweg unbedingt zu vermeiden ist, wenn
> dadurch Zweifel in der Taktauffassung entstehen könnten. (Just about how to
> notate rhythme: to shorten
From: Johannes Gebauer
On 18.02.2004 17:11 Uhr, David W. Fenton wrote
> Finale is actually correct about this, because you've told it that
> the beat is the quarter note, and modern notational standards require
> that note values larger than the beat (with certain exceptions) be
> notated
On 18.02.2004 19:34 Uhr, David W. Fenton wrote
> Unless the musical gesture contradicts it, note values that span more
> than one beat should be broken down into component note values tied
> together, except when the meter involved conventionally does not do
> this (e.g., 4/4, 2/4 and to a lesser
On 18 Feb 2004 at 17:49, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
> On 18.02.2004 17:11 Uhr, David W. Fenton wrote
>
> > Finale is actually correct about this, because you've told it that
> > the beat is the quarter note, and modern notational standards
> > require that note values larger than the beat (with cert
David Fenton gave you one suggestion which might solve your problem. If
it doesn't, then go into the Quantization settings dialogue and check
the Soften Syncopations box.
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many thanks to all those who responded so quickly to my question about
changing t
On 18.02.2004 17:11 Uhr, David W. Fenton wrote
> Finale is actually correct about this, because you've told it that
> the beat is the quarter note, and modern notational standards require
> that note values larger than the beat (with certain exceptions) be
> notated with smaller note values tied t
On 18 Feb 2004 at 10:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am working on a document in 6/4. When I try to use the Mass Edit
> copy function to copy a dotted quarter followed by an eighth note, I
> get a quarter note tied to an eighth note followed by another eighth.
> It is a total nuisance, given th
Many thanks to all those who responded so quickly to my question about
changing the playback tempo.
Now here's another one:
I am working on a document in 6/4. When I try to use the Mass Edit copy
function to copy a dotted quarter followed by an eighth note, I get a
quarter note tied to an eighth
14 matches
Mail list logo
