RE: [Finale] Dumb question

2002-05-21 Thread Michael Withers
Sound advice - I've wasted lots of rehearsal time forgetting *that* one! --- On Mon 05/20, Wiz-of-Oz wrote: > When you start numbering from the first full measure > (which seems the most logical, a pickup is just an upbeat to a full > measure after all, isn't it?) > just make double sure that

RE: [Finale] Dumb question

2002-05-20 Thread Wiz-of-Oz
When you start numbering from the first full measure (which seems the most logical, a pickup is just an upbeat to a full measure after all, isn't it?) just make double sure that you didn't forget to input apropriate rests in all silent voices of the pickup, so that every extracted part would cl

Re: [Finale] Dumb question

2002-05-20 Thread Christopher BJ Smith
At 6:41 AM -0400 5/20/02, David H. Bailey wrote: > >Here is another corollary to Linda's question: How do you number >1st and 2nd endings? Do you keep the numbers running right through >all the measures of the two endings in a linear fashion, or do you >begin a new region following the 2nd en

Re: [Finale] Dumb question

2002-05-20 Thread Ken Durling
On Mon, 20 May 2002 13:51:19 +0100, you wrote: >Linda Worsley wrote: >>Anyone out there have the gospel according to whomever? Do I need >>to call my pickup measure "measure one"? > > >No, please don't. If you tell an orchestra to make a sforzando at the >beginning of the 2nd measure they will

Re: [Finale] Dumb question

2002-05-20 Thread John Bell
Linda Worsley wrote: >Anyone out there have the gospel according to whomever? Do I need >to call my pickup measure "measure one"? No, please don't. If you tell an orchestra to make a sforzando at the beginning of the 2nd measure they will _all_ take that to mean the 2nd full measure. If you

Re: [Finale] Dumb question

2002-05-20 Thread David H. Bailey
Jón Kristinn Cortez wrote: > On 20.5.2002 03:43, "Linda Worsley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>You'd think after a hundred years of writing music and copying >>manuscripts I'd know this, but when I was asked today, and gave "my" >>answer, it made me think: Is this right??? Help me, o list

Re: [Finale] Dumb question

2002-05-19 Thread Ken Durling
On Sun, 19 May 2002 20:43:27 -0700, you wrote: >You'd think after a hundred years of writing music and copying >manuscripts I'd know this, but when I was asked today, and gave "my" >answer, it made me think: Is this right??? Help me, o list gurus. > >I generally do not call a pickup measure "m

Re: [Finale] Dumb question

2002-05-19 Thread Linda Worsley
At 4:14 AM + 5/20/02, Jón Kristinn Cortez wrote: >On 20.5.2002 03:43, "Linda Worsley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do I need to > > call my pickup measure "measure one"? > >The measure that is full according to the time-signature is the first >measure. Like you wrote [clip] >Now I must find

Re: [Finale] Dumb question

2002-05-19 Thread Jón Kristinn Cortez
On 20.5.2002 03:43, "Linda Worsley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You'd think after a hundred years of writing music and copying > manuscripts I'd know this, but when I was asked today, and gave "my" > answer, it made me think: Is this right??? Help me, o list gurus. > > I generally do not call