Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests question

2003-02-12 Thread Scott Jones
Johannes Gebauer writes: It's an idea. I now wonder, however, whether the number should in fact be on both staves anyway. Or should it be in between the staves? Yes. I believe I have seen keyboard parts where the multimeasure rest number was between the staves. It certainly makes sense. Inste

RE: [Finale] Multimeasure rests question

2003-02-12 Thread Wiz-of-Oz
as far as I can remember these should go in between. It's a nightmare in Finale. Sometimes is easier to edit a PDF file. cheers, Abel Johannes Gebauer wrote: > It's an idea. I now wonder, however, whether the number should in > fact be on > both staves anyway. Or should it be in between the st

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests question

2003-02-12 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 12.02.2003 18:41 Uhr, Harold Owen wrote > Johannes Gebauer writes: > >> It's an idea. I now wonder, however, whether the number should in fact be on >> both staves anyway. Or should it be in between the staves? > > Yes. I believe I have seen keyboard parts where the multimeasure rest > number

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests question

2003-02-12 Thread Harold Owen
Johannes Gebauer writes: It's an idea. I now wonder, however, whether the number should in fact be on both staves anyway. Or should it be in between the staves? Yes. I believe I have seen keyboard parts where the multimeasure rest number was between the staves. It certainly makes sense. Instea

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests question

2003-02-12 Thread David H. Bailey
I don't think it will do any harm to have it in both places -- less likely to be overlooked or misread if the performer is keeping attention on the bottom staff for whatever reason. Johannes Gebauer wrote: On 12.02.2003 13:51 Uhr, Mr. Liudas Motekaitis wrote Finale 2001d Windows: Create an

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests question

2003-02-12 Thread Mr. Liudas Motekaitis
IL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:57 PM Subject: Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests question > On 12.02.2003 13:51 Uhr, Mr. Liudas Motekaitis wrote > > > Finale 2001d Windows: > > > > Create an opaque expression which consists only of an enclosed rectangle

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests question

2003-02-12 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 12.02.2003 13:51 Uhr, Mr. Liudas Motekaitis wrote > Finale 2001d Windows: > > Create an opaque expression which consists only of an enclosed rectangle > with a line thickness of "0". Make sure to connect this expression to a note > which is in a frame which comes *after* the multimeasure rest,

Re: [Finale] Multimeasure rests question

2003-02-12 Thread Mr. Liudas Motekaitis
Finale 2001d Windows: Create an opaque expression which consists only of an enclosed rectangle with a line thickness of "0". Make sure to connect this expression to a note which is in a frame which comes *after* the multimeasure rest, otherwise the number will not get covered. Place this expressio