On 15 Nov 2004, at 11:25 AM, JD wrote:
on 11/14/04 9:21 PM, Noel Stoutenburg at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
try to sell the client, that based on the new book on notation by
Akareshnikovitzky and Herzenvortragengruber, _Musical Notation for All
Times and in All Styles_, that the preferred notational s
I notice an updated Dolet lite plugin is posted to the Finale site
today, too.
ns
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Thanks, Rick.
Ray H.
Rick Neal wrote:
That was a problem I had last week. I finally called MakeMusic and they gave me
the authorization code and I put it in through the register by fax/mail option.
I have been hesitant about applying the update on my desktop. Of course, if
everyone else is updat
At 07:34 PM 11/15/2004, Jari Williamsson wrote:
>The bugs regarding tuplets being affected by expressions and
>articulations are fixed. However, I would say that the bracket/number
>bug is still there, although it's not as huge as in the initial version
>of Fin2005. (The sequences of the tuplet mar
At 06:49 PM 11/15/2004, Christopher Smith wrote:
>I'll check it when I get home, but are you on Mac or PC? I'm on mac.
I'm on PC, but it shouldn't matter. This was not a platform-specific bug,
so hopefully the fix isn't, either.
Thanks,
Aaron.
___
Fina
Aaron Sherber wrote:
Can anyone with the 2005a update confirm that Engraver Tuplet bugs are
fixed as listed in the Readme -- in particular, that tuplet numbers no
longer avoid expressions "with undesirable results" and that the
vertical position of the number no longer "varies greatly depending
On Monday, November 15, 2004, at 06:23 PM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone with the 2005a update confirm that Engraver Tuplet bugs are
fixed as listed in the Readme -- in particular, that tuplet numbers no
longer avoid expressions "with undesirable results" and that the
vertical position of
Hi,
Can anyone with the 2005a update confirm that Engraver Tuplet bugs are
fixed as listed in the Readme -- in particular, that tuplet numbers no
longer avoid expressions "with undesirable results" and that the vertical
position of the number no longer "varies greatly depending on the context"?
d. collins wrote:
Still trying to find a solution to create EPS files from Finale, I
installed Virtual PC, and then Windows 98 and Finale 2004 on my
computer. But it won't run (DLL missing, and other error messages). Are
there any known problems with Finale 2004 and Win98?
No, they are compatibl
That was a problem I had last week. I finally called MakeMusic and they gave me
the authorization code and I put it in through the register by fax/mail option.
I have been hesitant about applying the update on my desktop. Of course, if
everyone else is updating with no problems, it must have bee
On Monday, November 15, 2004, at 04:15 PM, Andrew Stiller wrote:
I am trying to update a file from FinMac 2K2 to 2K4. It contains an
eps graphic containing my logo, wh. features a bit of music. When I
update the file, the noteheads and clef *in this graphic only* appear
in a default text fon
Javier,
I googled the author, but I can only find a treatise by the co-author -
"Structural Properties of Gingerbread in Residential Construction"
which I don't think is what I am looking for.
There was also a link to Jonathan Swift's "A Modest Proposal" in text
form, which I didn't quite under
On Monday, November 15, 2004, at 11:25 AM, JD wrote:
on 11/14/04 9:21 PM, Noel Stoutenburg at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
try to sell the client, that based on the new book on notation by
Akareshnikovitzky and Herzenvortragengruber, _Musical Notation for All
Times and in All Styles_, that the preferr
I am trying to update a file from FinMac 2K2 to 2K4. It contains an
eps graphic containing my logo, wh. features a bit of music. When I
update the file, the noteheads and clef *in this graphic only* appear
in a default text font rather than in Petrucci or whatever music font I
was using. Adv
Last week, before I left town for some concerts, wasn't there some
caution expressed concerning the FinWin2005a update and losing one's
registration? What happened concerning that?
RBH
Wasn't this fixed in Fin2005a?
Best regards,
Jari Williamsson
__
The only way I have found to reliably make EPS files in Windows is to first
make a PDF file with Distiller and then save from Acrobat as EPS. Lots of
important settings and you need to crop it in Acrobat.
BF
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of d
file>print>[copies &pages]>output options> check save as
file>postcript...ta-d!
Godofredo
d. collins wrote:
Still trying to find a solution to create EPS files from Finale, I
installed Virtual PC, and then Windows 98 and Finale 2004 on my
computer. But it won't run (DLL missing, and oth
I wrote:
I have noticed a problem when converting older files with first
ending repeats into Finale 2005. Instead of jumping to the second
ending on the second pass, playback jumps to the first measure. It
is easy to correct by resetting the first ending repeat to "Next
Ending" or "Forward" wi
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:45:19 -0500, dhbailey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brad Beyenhof wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:02:12 +, Javier Ruiz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>There is a workaround: Create another staff above the violin part.
>>>Show zero staff lines and turn off barlines, ti
Brad Beyenhof wrote:
I'm sure Javier meant this to go to the list as well, but it only got
sent to me:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:02:12 +, Javier Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is a workaround: Create another staff above the violin part.
Show zero staff lines and turn off barlines, time sign
Hey, I'd email you the PDF's but I'm on dial up.
RBH
Javier Ruiz wrote:
This book is only available to people who suffered the "drunk ties" problem
of Finale 2.0 when you printed in a dot matrix printer.
In any case due to the weight of the book the shipping costs are outrageous.
If you google fo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We Aussies are finally being offered WinFin2005.
Is it worth it? I heard lots of complaints about it being very slow.
Slow compared to what? Fin2004 was slow if you didn't turn off automatic
lyric updating, but that was fixed in Fin2005. Also, Fin2004's screen
update syst
Harold Owen wrote:
I have noticed a problem when converting older files with first ending
repeats into Finale 2005. Instead of jumping to the second ending on the
second pass, playback jumps to the first measure. It is easy to correct
by resetting the first ending repeat to "Next Ending" or "For
This book is only available to people who suffered the "drunk ties" problem
of Finale 2.0 when you printed in a dot matrix printer.
In any case due to the weight of the book the shipping costs are outrageous.
If you google for the book, you can search also for the co-writer, Hansel.
Oops, I gott
Dear folks,
I have noticed a problem when converting older files with first
ending repeats into Finale 2005. Instead of jumping to the second
ending on the second pass, playback jumps to the first measure. It is
easy to correct by resetting the first ending repeat to "Next Ending"
or "Forward"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We Aussies are finally being offered WinFin2005.
Is it worth it? I heard lots of complaints about it being very slow.
I've got 2004. What features are worth having in 2005?
David McKay
This message was sent through MyMail http://www.mymail.com.au
___
on 11/14/04 9:21 PM, Noel Stoutenburg at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> try to sell the client, that based on the new book on notation by
> Akareshnikovitzky and Herzenvortragengruber, _Musical Notation for All
> Times and in All Styles_, that the preferred notational style for his
> music at this tim
I'm sure Javier meant this to go to the list as well, but it only got
sent to me:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:02:12 +, Javier Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a workaround: Create another staff above the violin part.
> Show zero staff lines and turn off barlines, time signatures, and all
At 04:34 AM 11/15/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>We Aussies are finally being offered WinFin2005.
>Is it worth it?
It always depends what you mean by "worth it". For me, if there's even a
small improvement or two that saves me a few hours of work over the course
of the year, that justifies the u
JD wrote:
on 11/14/04 8:11 PM, Noel Stoutenburg at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I set up regions for the
numbers to always display on the top staff and with the staff tool to
display on the Vln. 1 staff. So far so good. There are points in the score
where Vln. 1 are out for a system, where Vln. 2 or
The tuplets alone are worth it for me. Spacing, Repeats, Grace notes.
It all depends on what you are doing, but the tuplets alone save me
time..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We Aussies are finally being offered WinFin2005.
Is it worth it? I heard lots of complaints about it being very slo
We Aussies are finally being offered WinFin2005.
Is it worth it? I heard lots of complaints about it being very slow.
I've got 2004. What features are worth having in 2005?
David McKay
This message was sent through MyMail http://www.mymail.com.au
__
Maybe I hadn’t noticed before, but working on a piece
with lots of ties and syncopation, WinFin 2001 seems to offer bizarre note spacing
in such measures.
I work mainly in ‘note spacing’ mode, as opposed
to ‘beat spacing’ or ‘time sig spacing’.
Is this problem fixable- or must I twe
33 matches
Mail list logo