On 2011-07-27 21:34, Wade KOTTER wrote:
Note the minimum systems requirements for Sibelius 7:
Since Sib is on a 2-year release schedule, they had the choice to go
64-bit with this release or wait 2 years. I think they made the right
decision, since (I believe) much of the school and home/hobby
On 7/27/2011 9:37 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Except there is no native way to import finale files. If they want
finale users that bad, then they should have Sibelius able to open up
to finale 2011 files right from the program. They used to, I believe,
have something like this in a previous
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Except there is no native way to import finale files. If they want
finale users that bad, then they should have Sibelius able to open up
to finale 2011 files right from the program. They used to, I believe,
have something like this in a previous version
Which is true;
i find it best to set them perfectly in the parts and accept how they
look in the score. since the grace notes are fixed (not
proportional) distance from the note they belong to, in general they
spacing in relation to the main note should be acceptably close in
MOST cases.
you can also
On 7/28/2011 3:44 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
Since Sib is on a 2-year release schedule, they had the choice to go
64-bit with this release or wait 2 years.
Please not that Sib is not exclusively 64-bit, at least not on Windows.
On my 64-bit Windows 7 systej, the demo installed both a 64-bit
Hi Jef,
If you are using *voiced* linked parts (multiple parts/staff), grace note
spacing cannot be adjusted in the parts. That is the longstanding bug we are
complaining about.
Cheers,
- DJA
-
WEB: http://www.secretsocietymusic.org
On 28 Jul 2011, at 5:16 AM, SN jef chippewa wrote:
yep, we're talking about the same thing: you can in fact adjust it in
the PT, but the grace notes remain linked (i.e. will also move in the
SC), i'm just saying sometimes the positioning discrepancy is not so
critical. using the opt-click on the measure trick i mentioned will
avoid having
Hi Jef,
Adjust it how? Special tools and Speedy are disabled in *voiced* linked parts.
Try it and see.
Cheers,
- DJA
-
WEB: http://www.secretsocietymusic.org
On 28 Jul 2011, at 9:46 AM, SN jef chippewa wrote:
you can in fact adjust it in
the PT
just tried voices (which i almost never use) and it works. i
adjusted the grace notes (special tools) in two separate voices (not
layers) independently from within the PT (F2010)
http://newmusicnotation.com/TEMPFILES/grace_voices.pdf
Adjust it how? Special tools and Speedy are disabled in
At 7:41 AM -0400 7/28/11, Aaron Sherber wrote:
On 7/28/2011 3:44 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
Since Sib is on a 2-year release schedule, they had the choice to go
64-bit with this release or wait 2 years.
Please not that Sib is not exclusively 64-bit, at least not on Windows.
On my 64-bit
Jef,
You are still not understanding. I think it's likely that you've never tried
the specific thing we are talking about. I'm assuming it must not come up in
your work.
We aren't talking about voices. Or layers.
We are talking about *voiced* linked parts -- i.e., 1 staff, two parts. For
On 2011-07-28 19:42, John Howell wrote:
And please note that Sib is not necessarily on a
2-year release schedule.
Which version during the last 10 years was not released timely within
the 2-year release period?
Best regards,
Jari Williamsson
___
Good proposal for you.. http://idreamholidays.co.in/page.php?yID=21ym5
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Is there any way to get Finale 2011 to consistently apply alternate notation
staff styles that are entered using a metatool to linked parts as well as
the score? Even with a file generated in 2011 (not a template converted from
an older version) I have inconsistent results - sometimes from bar to
Huh..I kinda think Alternate notation is pretty much rock solid in 2011.
Are you sure you have things selected correctly when copying?
--
Eric Dannewitz
Musician/Polymath/Evil Genius
http://www.gplus.to/ericdano
On Thursday, July 28, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Brian Williams wrote:
Is there any
At 8:02 PM +0200 7/28/11, Jari Williamsson wrote:
On 2011-07-28 19:42, John Howell wrote:
And please note that Sib is not necessarily on a
2-year release schedule.
Which version during the last 10 years was not released timely within
the 2-year release period?
I honestly don't have a clue.
I haven't figured this out either, but what works consistently is to select all
with the staff tool (in the score) and invoke Use selected styles for score
and parts. You can find that in th staff tool menu or in the contextual menu.
Then everything appears as it should. You only need to do
ah! yes, totally right, have never tried it because i would never use
this in the stuff i score.
You are still not understanding. I think it's likely that you've
never tried the specific thing we are talking about. I'm assuming it
must not come up in your work.
but here i must correct you,
make sure your staff styles are copyable (checkbox in the setup dialogue)
same as others have said, try control-menu to apply styles, there are
choices there to Apply Staff Style to... SC/PTs (selectively) or
this SC/PT only
___
Finale mailing list
Why is it that when I use clear all items everything disappears
except for the double barlines. Those I have to get rid of individually.
Mike G.
Finale 2011 iMac 10.5.8
www.mikegreensill.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
Technically, double barlines are measure attributes, not items. Bars are not
respaced and system breaks are not removed either, when you clear all. Happily,
though, you don't have to change them individually. While everything is
selected, click the measure tool, double click any of the selected
Many thanks to those who helped with my grace note spacing problem. It feels
like the old days, extracting parts then massaging them! Reminds me how much
(this feature excepted) linked parts have made my Finale life easier.
FWIW I did submit a case. And in doing so I saw the page where they
On 27 Jul 2011 at 13:34, Wade KOTTER wrote:
Note the minimum systems requirements for Sibelius 7:
http://www.sibelius.com/products/sibelius/7/system_requirements.html
The requirement for Windows 7 SP1 is bogus, I'm sure. If they support
Vista, they have to support intervening versions of
On 28 Jul 2011 at 9:44, Jari Williamsson wrote:
On 2011-07-27 21:34, Wade KOTTER wrote:
Note the minimum systems requirements for Sibelius 7:
Since Sib is on a 2-year release schedule, they had the choice to go
64-bit with this release or wait 2 years.
Er, what? There's nothing in there
On 7/28/2011 4:57 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 28 Jul 2011 at 9:44, Jari Williamsson wrote:
On 2011-07-27 21:34, Wade KOTTER wrote:
Note the minimum systems requirements for Sibelius 7:
Since Sib is on a 2-year release schedule, they had the choice to go
64-bit with this release or wait 2
Thanks Christopher...that works.
Mike G.
www.mikegreensill.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
On 28 Jul 2011 at 17:25, David H. Bailey wrote:
On 7/28/2011 4:57 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 28 Jul 2011 at 9:44, Jari Williamsson wrote:
On 2011-07-27 21:34, Wade KOTTER wrote:
Note the minimum systems requirements for Sibelius 7:
Since Sib is on a 2-year release schedule, they
On 28 Jul 2011 at 7:41, Aaron Sherber wrote:
On 7/28/2011 3:44 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
Since Sib is on a 2-year release schedule, they had the choice to go
64-bit with this release or wait 2 years.
Please not that Sib is not exclusively 64-bit, at least not on
Windows. On my 64-bit
On 7/28/2011 5:37 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 28 Jul 2011 at 17:25, David H. Bailey wrote:
On 7/28/2011 4:57 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 28 Jul 2011 at 9:44, Jari Williamsson wrote:
On 2011-07-27 21:34, Wade KOTTER wrote:
Note the minimum systems requirements for Sibelius 7:
Since Sib
On 28 Jul 2011 at 17:50, David H. Bailey wrote:
On 7/28/2011 5:37 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 28 Jul 2011 at 17:25, David H. Bailey wrote:
On 7/28/2011 4:57 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 28 Jul 2011 at 9:44, Jari Williamsson wrote:
On 2011-07-27 21:34, Wade KOTTER wrote:
Note the
On 27 Jul 2011 at 14:36, David H. Bailey wrote:
It will be interesting come the Fall when Finale finally gets their
new version out the door, to see whether Finale's become 64-bit and
has other modernization features.
The only benefit of 64-bit for Finale on Windows would be, I think,
in
On 7/28/2011 4:58 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 28 Jul 2011 at 7:41, Aaron Sherber wrote:
On 7/28/2011 3:44 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
Since Sib is on a 2-year release schedule, they had the choice to go
64-bit with this release or wait 2 years.
Please not that Sib is not exclusively
32 matches
Mail list logo
