Good day kind Finale users!
I have a question about an Ordonez symphony source. There is a squiggly line
above two notes, almost like a tie, but it's not.
It's used several times and my editor and publisher is stumped by it (and
he's a violinist).
Any guesses?
A screen shot is viewable @
You're way beyond my knowledge, Kim, but if I were playing that, I'd
be tempted to use them as mordents.
Dick H
Olympia, Wa
On Sep 1, 2011, at 8:25 AM, Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
Good day kind Finale users!
I have a question about an Ordonez symphony source. There is a
squiggly line
above
Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
Good day kind Finale users!
I have a question about an Ordonez symphony source. There is a squiggly line
above two notes, almost like a tie, but it's not.
It's used several times and my editor and publisher is stumped by it (and
he's a violinist).
Any guesses?
They look a lot like trills/mordents from the period, but they are placed
unidiomatically.
I have a recording and they're played straight on that.
Steve P.
On 1 Sep 2011, at 16:49, Dick Hauser wrote:
You're way beyond my knowledge, Kim, but if I were playing that, I'd
be tempted to use
On 31 Aug 2011, at 4:51 PM, Ryan wrote:
Hi List,
Doing some cleaning. I don't see any reason why I'd need to keep my
old Finale 3.7 manuals around anymore. But, I'm hesitant to toss them.
Is there any reason I should keep these around?
No.
I haven't used them in
MANY years. Will I be
Patrick wrote:
I have a question about an Ordonez symphony source. There is a squiggly line
above two notes, almost like a tie, but it's not.
===
Ooh ooh, I know this one!
It's the equivalent of a slur over staccato. Source: Clive Brown's
*Classical and Romantic Performing Practice, 1750-1900
Neumann says this mark means Vibrato.
Guy Hayden
--Original Message-
From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf Of
Kim Patrick Clow
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 11:25 AM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: [Finale] O.T. 18th century notation question
Good day
This is consistent with how it's played on my cd too.
Steve P.
On 1 Sep 2011, at 18:08, Andrew Levin wrote:
t's the equivalent of a slur over staccato. Source: Clive Brown's
*Classical and Romantic Performing Practice, 1750-1900
___
Finale mailing
I've already seen this marking in baroque music: in a string part it denotes a
measured Bogenvibrato, a change in intensity (not in pitch), created with the
bow. Basically you should play the notes completely legato, in the same bow
stroke, with a effect on each note.
If it were written in
On Thu Sep 1, at ThursdaySep 1 12:05 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 31 Aug 2011, at 4:51 PM, Ryan wrote:
Hi List,
Doing some cleaning. I don't see any reason why I'd need to keep my
old Finale 3.7 manuals around anymore. But, I'm hesitant to toss them.
Is there any reason I should keep
Yes, I'm joking. I've been watching too many episodes of Pawn Stars.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Darcy James Argue djar...@mac.com wrote:
On 31 Aug 2011, at 4:51 PM, Ryan wrote:
Hi List,
Doing some cleaning. I don't see any reason why I'd need to keep my
old Finale 3.7 manuals around
It may well mean use vibrato---it sounds like something that Boccherini and
others use for vibrato.
Margaret Whitby
Margaret Whitby
jwhi...@uwo.ca
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
I've never seen anything quite like it. My guess from the context is that it
may be an eccentric way of notating a hooked bowing.
Steve Larsen
-Original Message-
From: Steve Parker [mailto:st...@pinkrat.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 11:05 AM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re:
At 3:43 PM -0400 9/1/11, Margaret whitby wrote:
It may well mean use vibrato---it sounds like
something that Boccherini and others use for
vibrato.
Margaret Whitby
I wondered about that, but the consistent use on
shorter note values and on repeated notes argues
against it.
John
--
John
Why not try ebay? There might be someone around the world interested in those
manuals.
Giovanni Andreani
On 31 Aug 2011, at 22:51, Ryan ry.squa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi List,
Doing some cleaning. I don't see any reason why I'd need to keep my
old Finale 3.7 manuals around anymore. But, I'm
At 6:22 PM +0100 9/1/11, Steve Parker wrote:
This is consistent with how it's played on my cd too.
Steve P.
On 1 Sep 2011, at 18:08, Andrew Levin wrote:
t's the equivalent of a slur over staccato. Source: Clive Brown's
*Classical and Romantic Performing Practice, 1750-1900
Right. That
On 1 Sep 2011, at 18:33, Florence + Michael wrote:
I've already seen this marking in baroque music: in a string part it denotes
a measured Bogenvibrato, a change in intensity (not in pitch), created with
the bow.
In this instance, which has a minuet feel, the placement of markings
On 1 Sep 2011 at 14:43, Steve Larsen wrote:
I've never seen anything quite like it. My guess from the context is
that it may be an eccentric way of notating a hooked bowing.
There wasn't any such practice of indicated precise bowing in the
period.
It's either one of the two suggestions:
1.
At 7:33 PM +0200 9/1/11, Florence + Michael wrote:
I've already seen this marking in baroque music:
in a string part it denotes a measured
Bogenvibrato, a change in intensity (not in
pitch), created with the bow. Basically you
should play the notes completely legato, in the
same bow stroke,
They WERE the best manuals for any piece of software I've ever
learned, ever.
Couldn't agree more! When I got Finale 3.0 I learnt most of the basics
by reading the manual without the program even being open. It may be
my age...but there's no way reading it on-line can in any way compare
- Original Message -
From: Michael Greensill m...@mikegreensill.com
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 10:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] keeping old manuals
They WERE the best manuals for any piece of software I've ever
learned, ever.
Couldn't agree more! When I
21 matches
Mail list logo
