On 2011-11-03 23:52, Colin Broom wrote:
I spend a lot of time tweaking note durations in my writing.
Invariably I find myself deleting notes in a tied group, including
the first one. If the pitch that I delete has an accidental
attached to it, then I have to make sure I use the show
Finale 2012, Windows 7.
C.
--
Colin Broom
colin_br...@hotmail.com
--
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 10:12:32 +0100
From: jari.williams...@mailbox.swipnet.se
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Check Missing Accidentals Plugin?
On 2011-11-03 23:52, Colin Broom wrote:
I spend a lot
I spend a lot of time tweaking note durations in my writing. Invariably I find
myself deleting notes in a tied group, including the first one. If the pitch
that I delete has an accidental attached to it, then I have to make sure I use
the show accidental command in simple entry on the
When we use check range when writing for a competent community orchestra, is
there any problem with setting the
parameter to advanced for all instruments ?
thanks,
tim
On May 13, 2011, at 7:09 PM, John Howell wrote:
At 2:53 PM -0700 5/13/11, Mark D Lew wrote:
Mahler writes the chorus
Are there specific instruments you're worried about?
-Lee
From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu]On Behalf
Of timothy.price
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 4:22 PM
When we use check range when writing for a competent community
orchestra, is there any problem with
The difference between intermediate and advanced became a bit restrictive,
most notably with the f french horns. The lowest written note permitted was a
F in the base clef below middle C when I would like to take it down to the B.
Actual pitch lowest sound would be, in intermediate , C ...
At 12:09 AM -0400 5/14/11, timothy.price wrote:
The difference between intermediate and
advanced became a bit restrictive, most
notably with the f french horns. The lowest
written note permitted was a
F in the base clef below middle C when I would
like to take it down to the B. Actual
There hasn't been much recently.
David H. Bailey
Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Yeah, I obviously got your reply, and a couple of others, but I don't
seem to be getting the normal list traffic, unless there hasn't been any.
Dean
On Oct 10, 2008, at 2:56 PM, Dana Friedman wrote:
At 02:25 PM
Is anybody out there, or have I been unsubscribed again?
Dean
Dean M. Estabrook
http://deanestabrook.googlepages.com/home
When I am working on a problem, I never think about beauty. But
when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know
it is wrong.
R. Buckminster Fuller
In a message dated 10/10/2008 19:28:11 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Is anybody out there, or have I been unsubscribed again?
You're getting through, but are you receiving?
(This sent to list and privately)
lawrenceyates.co.uk
**
At 02:25 PM 10/10/2008, you wrote:
Is anybody out there, or have I been unsubscribed again?
I see you..but..I wonder, can someone please respond to me? I'm
getting messages, but...I'm guessing maybe no one's seeing mine?
Thanks,
Dana
___
Finale
The list is working
At 10/10/2008 02:25 PM, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Is anybody out there, or have I been unsubscribed again?
Dean
Dean M. Estabrook
http://deanestabrook.googlepages.com/home
When I am working on a problem, I never think about beauty. But
when I have finished, if the
In a message dated 10/10/2008 22:57:00 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I see you..but..I wonder, can someone please respond to me? I'm
getting messages, but...I'm guessing maybe no one's seeing mine?
Receiving (this reply sent to list and privately
lawrenceyates.co.uk
On 10.10.2008, at 21:56, Dana Friedman wrote:
At 02:25 PM 10/10/2008, you wrote:
Is anybody out there, or have I been unsubscribed again?
I see you..but..I wonder, can someone please respond to me? I'm
getting messages, but...I'm guessing maybe no one's seeing mine?
Thanks,
Dana
I see
Yeah, I obviously got your reply, and a couple of others, but I don't
seem to be getting the normal list traffic, unless there hasn't been
any.
Dean
On Oct 10, 2008, at 2:56 PM, Dana Friedman wrote:
At 02:25 PM 10/10/2008, you wrote:
Is anybody out there, or have I been unsubscribed
At 05:59 PM 10/10/2008, you wrote:
On 10.10.2008, at 21:56, Dana Friedman wrote:
At 02:25 PM 10/10/2008, you wrote:
Is anybody out there, or have I been unsubscribed again?
I see you..but..I wonder, can someone please respond to me? I'm
getting messages, but...I'm guessing maybe no one's
Here is a tip for users of the FinMac 2k8a upgrade.
Make sure the upgraded version of Finale is 2008a.r1 in the info
window or alternately, 13.0a.r1 in the preview pane.
The previous version of Finale was 2008.r2 in the info window and
13.0.r2 in the preview pane.
The problem with the 2k8a
Well, there you go ... I never was aware there was such a plugin.
Dean
On Feb 26, 2007, at 9:00 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
It works fine. I used it today.
Matthew Hindson fastmail acct wrote:
Can anyone else confirm that this utility doesn't work any more
under Finale 2007 Mac?
Matthew
On 27.02.2007 Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Well, there you go ... I never was aware there was such a plugin.
It's not actually a plugin, it has been present in Finale since I know
Finale (something like 3.2).
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
Works for me in FinMac 2007c. I do recall problems in the original
release, though.
Cheers,
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 26 Feb 2007, at 11:49 PM, Matthew Hindson fastmail acct wrote:
Can anyone else confirm that this utility doesn't work any more
under Finale 2007
It works fine. I used it today.
Matthew Hindson fastmail acct wrote:
Can anyone else confirm that this utility doesn't work any more under
Finale 2007 Mac?
Matthew
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
21 matches
Mail list logo
