On 18.12.2005 Chuck Israels wrote:
I found the GPO instrument libraries and removed the non-notation
instruments - out them in a separate "storage" folder, so I won't
have to reinstall the whole package, if I ever need them. (Not that
I can imagine why I would - having no sequencing program
OK, I'll send another message and ask for a "c" update that addresses
this. We can all dream of improvements, but this is the only
remaining large annoyance for me.
I found the GPO instrument libraries and removed the non-notation
instruments - out them in a separate "storage" folder, so I
Hey Chuck,
The upshot of what I was saying -- if anyone wants to see these
performance issues addressed in Fin2006c, the time to push for it is
now.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://secretsociety.typepad.com
Brooklyn, NY
On 18 Dec 2005, at 2:14 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
On Dec 17
On Dec 17, 2005, at 10:57 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 17 Dec 2005, at 9:21 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
BTW - 2006b seems to be working pretty well, but the delay in mass
edit area selection (and related things like measure tool and
staff tool area selections) and nudging delay are still a
Le 05-12-18 à 01:57, Darcy James Argue a écrit :If you are finding that FinMac2006b is slower overall than FinMac2005, definitely mention this to MacSupport. You might also want to encourage them to release a Fin2006c release that specifically addresses these delays. Finale 2006b is faster than 200
On 17 Dec 2005, at 9:21 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
BTW - 2006b seems to be working pretty well, but the delay in mass
edit area selection (and related things like measure tool and staff
tool area selections) and nudging delay are still annoyingly slow.
MM says that this is a result of a rede
