>
> Jonathan
>
>
> > On 23 Apr 2018, at 08:49, finale-requ...@shsu.edu wrote:
> >
> > From: Christopher Smith christopher.sm...@videotron.ca>>
> > Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale Linked Parts: what's missing?
> > Date: 22 April 2018 at 23:51:34
> >
ale-requ...@shsu.edu wrote:
>
> From: Christopher Smith <mailto:christopher.sm...@videotron.ca>>
> Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale Linked Parts: what's missing?
> Date: 22 April 2018 at 23:51:34
> To: mailto:finale@shsu.edu>>
>
>
> Ooh, ooh, ooh! I got t
statement?
> >
> > -Lee
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf
> > Of
> > Christopher Smith
> > Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 2:52 PM
> > To: finale@shsu.edu
> > Subject
istopher Smith
> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 2:52 PM
> To: finale@shsu.edu
> Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale Linked Parts: what's missing?
>
> Ooh, ooh, ooh! I got this!
>
> Fewer files is a HUGE time saver! You can enter all the cues with copy and
> paste (or the pl
ailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf Of
Christopher Smith
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 2:52 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale Linked Parts: what's missing?
Ooh, ooh, ooh! I got this!
Fewer files is a HUGE time saver! You can enter all the cues with copy and
paste (or th
Ooh, ooh, ooh! I got this!
Fewer files is a HUGE time saver! You can enter all the cues with copy and
paste (or the plugin, which I find buggy) without pasting between documents,
you can change the font sizes for tempi and rehearsal letters ONCE (or anything
else ONCE) and have it apply to all
2:21 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale Linked Parts: what's missing?
My solution for many of these things (and I think many others have the
same workflow) is to have one file for the score and one file for the
(linked) parts. This is not as good as one file for everything, but i
a subjective
>> judgement.
>>
>> -Lee
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf Of
>> Robert Patterson
>> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 6:32 AM
>> To: finale
>> Subject: [Fi
PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale Linked Parts: what's missing?
Your 2) and 3) are not correct. Music spacing is not linked between score and
parts. You can also change clef in parts with staff styles (transposition>set
to clef) in part only. 1) and 4) are valid, though.
its. Obviously this is a subjective
> judgement.
>
> -Lee
>
> -Original Message-
> From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf
> Of
> Robert Patterson
> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 6:32 AM
> To: finale
> Subject: [Finale] Finale
bviously this is a subjective
> > judgement.
> >
> > -Lee
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On
> Behalf Of
> > Robert Patterson
> > Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 6:32 AM
> >
as soon as the pain of special cases and
> workarounds is exceeded by the benefits. Obviously this is a subjective
> judgement.
>
> -Lee
>
> -Original Message-
> From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf Of
> Robert Patterson
bjective
judgement.
-Lee
-Original Message-
From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf Of
Robert Patterson
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 6:32 AM
To: finale
Subject: [Finale] Finale Linked Parts: what's missing?
I am starting a new thread because my comments seem to
I am starting a new thread because my comments seem to be buried in the
recent Dorico thread. I would like to poll this list about what features
are missing from Linked Parts. I am doing so with an eye towards a possible
plugin to address what can be addressed.
Things that cannot be addressed by a
14 matches
Mail list logo
