Re: [Finale] Mac Copy Protection Question

2005-10-13 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 13.10.2005 Aaron Sherber wrote: This might be different on Mac, as you say, but when I converted the file system on my Win2000 hard drive from FAT32 to NTFS -- on the *same* hard drive -- I had to re-register Finale. Yes, as far as I know it _is_ different on Mac and Win. Johannes --

[Finale] Mac Copy Protection Question

2005-10-12 Thread Brian Williams
Hi List, I recently bought and installed Tiger on my external 250 GB FireWire hard drive. I have Finale 2006 installed and authenticated on my internal 40 GB hard drive, which has the Jaguar OS installed. When I boot into Tiger from the external FW hard drive and launch Finale, it tells me I have

Re: [Finale] Mac Copy Protection Question

2005-10-12 Thread Darcy James Argue
Brian, You're much better off emailing/calling Macsupport about this. - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brooklyn, NY On 12 Oct 2005, at 6:45 PM, Brian Williams wrote: Hi List, I recently bought and installed Tiger on my external 250 GB FireWire hard drive. I have Finale 2006 installed and

Re: [Finale] Mac Copy Protection Question

2005-10-12 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 13.10.2005 Brian Williams wrote: I recently bought and installed Tiger on my external 250 GB FireWire hard drive. I have Finale 2006 installed and authenticated on my internal 40 GB hard drive, which has the Jaguar OS installed. When I boot into Tiger from the external FW hard drive and

Re: [Finale] Mac Copy Protection Question

2005-10-12 Thread Aaron Sherber
At 07:47 PM 10/12/2005, Johannes Gebauer wrote: As far as I know the Mac registration is based on the Ethernet MAC Address, not anything to do with the HD, This might be different on Mac, as you say, but when I converted the file system on my Win2000 hard drive from FAT32 to NTFS -- on the

Re: [Finale] Mac Copy Protection Question

2005-10-12 Thread David W. Fenton
On 12 Oct 2005 at 19:56, Aaron Sherber wrote: At 07:47 PM 10/12/2005, Johannes Gebauer wrote: As far as I know the Mac registration is based on the Ethernet MAC Address, not anything to do with the HD, This might be different on Mac, as you say, but when I converted the file system on my

Re: [Finale] Mac Copy Protection Question

2005-10-12 Thread A-NO-NE Music
David W. Fenton / 2005/10/12 / 10:35 PM wrote: However, I'm surprised to hear that changing the file system does, too. That makes very little sense to me. NTFS has much higher security level, tho. -- - Hiro Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA http://a-no-ne.com http://anonemusic.com

Re: [Finale] Mac Copy Protection Question

2005-10-12 Thread David W. Fenton
On 13 Oct 2005 at 0:18, A-NO-NE Music wrote: David W. Fenton / 2005/10/12 / 10:35 PM wrote: However, I'm surprised to hear that changing the file system does, too. That makes very little sense to me. NTFS has much higher security level, tho. Well, if by higher it has 0 security, yes,