Re: [Finale] Re: Classical saxophone

2010-02-08 Thread Robert Patterson
I'll jump in on this late, too. I haven't seen any discussion in this thread of the wind band repertoire. There are many "legit" sax players making a very good living playing in military bands in the US. There are also some non-military professional ensembles both in the US and elsewhere. _

Re: [Finale] Re: Classical saxophone

2010-02-08 Thread Bernard Savoie
Sorry for jumping in on this subject so late. I've been very busy trying to finish a project and I'm over a week late on my emails. Just wanted to point any interested parties to a wiki site I've set up to list material written for the saxophone. This particular link will get you to the sym

Re: [Finale] Re: Classical saxophone

2010-02-02 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Jan 31, 2010, at 7:39 AM, dhbailey wrote: I've attended the Boston Symphony Orchestra many times over the years and have never seen a sax on their stage. Then you've never heard them do the Lt. Kije Suite, Pictures at an Exhibition, or Bolero--to name but three. I cannot emphasize too m

Re: [Finale] Re: Classical saxophone

2010-01-31 Thread Dean M. Estabrook
These are great comments! It's sad the horn has been so maligned ... all the bad jokes, and all. Even my daughter, who is a fine musician, at the age of about 22 or so, had no clue that a sax is capable of sophisticated artistry ... until I played her a CD of Branford Marsalis (sp?) doin

Re: [Finale] Re: Classical saxophone

2010-01-31 Thread John Howell
At 7:39 AM -0500 1/31/10, dhbailey wrote: I'll bet even your local orchestra in Sacramento has a call-list where they know which saxophonists to call should there ever be a need. Not disagreeing with David here--which I seldom do--just expanding a bit. Our local string/chamber orchestra, f

Re: [Finale] Re: Classical saxophone

2010-01-31 Thread dhbailey
Dean M. Estabrook wrote: Unfortunately, when I go to a symphony concert, I rarely see a sax on stage, let alone three. I realize this is a commentary upon the literature our local symphony (Sacramento, CA) proffers. That's the situation in most orchestras. While much new music for orches

Re: [Finale] Re: Classical saxophone

2010-01-30 Thread Dean M. Estabrook
Unfortunately, when I go to a symphony concert, I rarely see a sax on stage, let alone three. I realize this is a commentary upon the literature our local symphony (Sacramento, CA) proffers. Dean On Jan 29, 2010, at 7:31 PM, John Howell wrote: At 4:28 PM -0500 1/29/10, Andrew Stiller wro

Re: [Finale] Re: Classical saxophone

2010-01-29 Thread John Howell
At 4:28 PM -0500 1/29/10, Andrew Stiller wrote: In the orchestra, I would go so far as to say that a complete sax section (3 players) has become standard for most composers these days--John Adams comes immediately to mind, but he is far from alone. That sounds like an important step forward,

Re: [Finale] Re: Classical saxophone

2010-01-29 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Jan 29, 2010, at 3:00 PM, David Froom wrote: I want all of you to know that the saxophone repertoire is not as thin as you would imagine, and, indeed, a LOT of very fine composers have already written pieces for saxophone and piano, saxophone quartet, saxophone in chamber contexts, and c

[Finale] Re: Classical saxophone

2010-01-29 Thread David Froom
Chuck Israels wrote: These responses have missed whatever point I probably shouldn't have bothered trying to make here, and that was that there is so little significant repertoire for "classical" saxophone, despite the existence of a number of fine players in that style, that favoring that style

[Finale] RE: Classical saxophone

2010-01-28 Thread Froom, David
At 11:58 AM -0500 1/28/10, Chuck Israels wrote: >I have always thought the classical music of the saxophone is what >Coleman Hawkins, Lester Young and Charlie Parker played, and that >music departments that don't recognize that are failing to see the >world as it is - to almost everyone's detriment