Aaron Sherber wrote:
(It's in the back of my head that there's some other native
Finale way to map these keys to tools, but I can't remember it right now.)
In Finale, it's the Tool-attached (and file-specific!) metatools. On
Windows, it's the function keys that can be mapped to tools.
Best r
At 02:19 PM 12/18/2007, Chuck Israels wrote:
>Randolph, FYI, you can get to the individual tuplet setting by double
>clicking on the tuplet with the selection tool and then clicking on
>the highlighted tuplet handle.
As I mentioned, you can also get those settings by right-clicking on
the tuple
Randolph, FYI, you can get to the individual tuplet setting by double
clicking on the tuplet with the selection tool and then clicking on
the highlighted tuplet handle. It's not ideal, but it does get you
there while still in the selection tool. The inconvenience is that
then you are
At 01:41 PM 12/18/2007, Randolph Peters wrote:
>Sorry, I meant that Change tuplets (or Change anything for that
>matter) is not a choice in the Selection Tool when you invoke the
>contextual menu. They added other items in 2008, but took this option
>off.
True. It's under the Utilities menu now.
Christopher Smith wrote:
Actually, it was even easier in the previous version where you
could get to the tuplet settings with a control-click
(right-click). I'm not sure why they took that away in 2008. I
guess I'll have to make another macro...
That is still there in my FinMac2008a. Control
On Dec 18, 2007, at 11:05 AM, Randolph Peters wrote:
Christopher Smith wrote:
FWIW, I found changing the tuplets to above in the choir parts
went very smoothly and quickly with the Utilities>Change...
Tuplets. One shot, very easy. I can't imagine a Staff Style being
any easier than that.
Randolph Peters wrote:
And while we are at it, why not another Staff Style option that
would take auto-positioned dynamics (usually below the staff) and
give them an override setting so that the dynamics could
automatically go above the staff? This would save having to make
duplicate sets of d
Christopher Smith wrote:
FWIW, I found changing the tuplets to above in the choir parts went
very smoothly and quickly with the Utilities>Change... Tuplets. One
shot, very easy. I can't imagine a Staff Style being any easier than
that.
I agree that it is not hard to change. Actually, it was e
Hey Jari,
But you would lose the collision avoidance for below-staff notes too.
This may or may not be a problem depending what the instrumentation
is, but if it's, say, SATB choir with orchestra, you probably want to
use two sets of dynamics.
Cheers,
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Broo
I would say, "Who knew?", but apparently Darcy knows (why am I not
surprised?). More invaluable information.
Thanks, Darcy.
Chuck
On Dec 18, 2007, at 7:38 AM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Hi Chris,
Finale actually comes with a pre-defined library of above-the-staff
choral dynamics: Librari
Darcy James Argue wrote:
Good tip, but that method won't automatically avoid low entries below
the staff or high ones above it. For that, you still need to use
duplicate expressions.
Unless it's a piece that was written for Yma Sumac, vocal parts are
normally not spanning that wide range tha
Hi Jari,
Good tip, but that method won't automatically avoid low entries below
the staff or high ones above it. For that, you still need to use
duplicate expressions.
Cheers,
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 18 Dec 2007, at 10:47 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
Randolph Pet
Hi Chris,
Finale actually comes with a pre-defined library of above-the-staff
choral dynamics: Libraries/Maestro Font/Choral Dynamics.
Cheers,
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 18 Dec 2007, at 9:36 AM, Christopher Smith wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007, at 7:41 AM, Aaron Sherber wr
Randolph Peters wrote:
And while we are at it, why not another Staff Style option that would
take auto-positioned dynamics (usually below the staff) and give them an
override setting so that the dynamics could automatically go above the
staff? This would save having to make duplicate sets of d
On Dec 18, 2007, at 6:36 AM, Christopher Smith wrote:
FWIW, I found changing the tuplets to above in the choir parts went
very smoothly and quickly with the Utilities>Change... Tuplets. One
shot, very easy. I can't imagine a Staff Style being any easier than
that.
If not for this lis
At 09:20 AM 12/18/2007, Chuck Israels wrote:
>Changing defaults affects all staves. Randolph is suggesting a
>different setting for vocal parts only, in both tuplets and dynamics.
Ah, sorry -- I misread his request.
Aaron.
___
Finale mailing list
Fi
At 09:36 AM 12/18/2007, Christopher Smith wrote:
>On Dec 18, 2007, at 7:41 AM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
>> Duplicate dynamics? Why not just place the regular dynamic in the
>> score and then shift-drag it to over the staff? This seems quicker
>> to me than applying a staff style.
>
>Because if you hav
On Dec 18, 2007, at 7:41 AM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
>And while we are at it, why not another Staff Style option that would
>take auto-positioned dynamics (usually below the staff) and give them
>an override setting so that the dynamics could automatically go above
>the staff? This would save havi
On Dec 18, 2007, at 4:41 AM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 12:32 AM 12/18/2007, Randolph Peters wrote:
>It would be great if there could be a Staff Style that would
>automatically place tuplets above the music. This would take care of
>the majority of tuplets in vocal parts. I know you can change the
At 12:32 AM 12/18/2007, Randolph Peters wrote:
>It would be great if there could be a Staff Style that would
>automatically place tuplets above the music. This would take care of
>the majority of tuplets in vocal parts. I know you can change the
>tuplets in one pass using what used to be called Ma
It would be great if there could be a Staff Style that would
automatically place tuplets above the music. This would take care of
the majority of tuplets in vocal parts. I know you can change the
tuplets in one pass using what used to be called Mass Mover, but
still, this would be useful.
And
21 matches
Mail list logo
