On 2012-07-05 11:40, David H. Bailey wrote:
> Curious -- what else did Recordare do?
I don't think the merge is just about buying existing products, it's
more long-term than that. What Gary and Michael can add to MM might very
well show up in the next major Finale release. To me, both the Recor
On 2012-07-04 22:34, John Blane wrote:
> I can't help thinking that if MM ever had a handle on how
> we worked with Finale, they might have integrated the
> kinds of plug-ins and innovations we have come to depend
> on Tobias for. They are indispensable, indeed. I would
> not assume that MM could
On 7/4/2012 2:35 PM, Henry Howey wrote:
> I'm noticing that several of the tools are now inoperable.
>
> MakeMusic MUST acquire and maintain TGTOOLS. I'm sure Garritan and MusicXML
> were not cheap. TGTOOLS would be much less.
>
MakeMusic acquiring TGTools would depend on Tobias's willingness to
On 7/4/2012 6:06 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> Oh, and boy hasn't that resulted in a TON of great products and updates from
> MakeMusic….I mean, MusicXML is taking the world by storm…..
>
Sarcasm aside, MusicXML has slowly been expanding its place in the
computer/music world, providing an inter-ap
On 7/4/2012 3:06 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> Indeed. It would have made MORE sense to acquire TGTools than the also-ran
> Garritan.
>
They may have tried and Tobias may well have said "No."
--
David H. Bailey
dhbai...@davidbaileymusicstudio.com
___
On 7/5/2012 4:06 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
> On 2012-07-05 00:06, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
>> Oh, and boy hasn't that resulted in a TON of great products
>> and updates from MakeMusic….I mean, MusicXML is taking the world by storm…..
>
> Yes, MusicXML is very widely used for notation conversion. And
On 2012-07-05 00:06, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> Oh, and boy hasn't that resulted in a TON of great products
> and updates from MakeMusic….I mean, MusicXML is taking the world by storm…..
Yes, MusicXML is very widely used for notation conversion. And I believe
MusicXML was just one of the reasons for
Whaaa? Staff Styles are AWESOME! They seem to have fixed in 2012b the
score styles not showing up properly in parts. Note-attached slurs,
also awesome (though not completely problem-free, but hey, whaddya
want?) Text, well, I am still waiting for partial point sizes and
centre justification
ja man, i still have my black F2004 T. keeping
it safe for another 30 years when i will bring it
out and much younger women will run to my side in
th(r)ongs because i will be so übercööl and
retro. by then, the bong PI lee spoke of will
*finally* be working properly and all the years
of kl
, July 04, 2012 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] TGTOOLS in 2012b
>
> man, for me the upgrade with finale water bottle was the awesomest.
> linked parts? meh. staff styles? meh. slurs that are note-attached
> instead of page-attached? mmight pay for that one. text and
&
What about the T-Shirts
--
Eric Dannewitz
Musician/Polymath/Evil Genius
http://www.ericdannewitz.com/
iMessage ericdannew...@me.com
On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 at 3:24 PM, SN jef chippewa wrote:
>
> man, for me the upgrade with finale water bottle was the awesomest.
> linked parts? meh.
man, for me the upgrade with finale water bottle was the awesomest.
linked parts? meh. staff styles? meh. slurs that are note-attached
instead of page-attached? mmight pay for that one. text and
graphics tool improvements? meh. unicode support? double meh. i
would give another 10
henry, which ones specifically are you noticing as problematic?
i would not trust (and some have described probs) with parts-related
tools, the reset staff groups has caused me very much anguish and i'm
no longer certain about the layout tool (although it could be part of
the probs i had with
Oh, but that was what the yearly $129 for the latest Finale 20XX was for right?
For them to fix bugs and re-introduce old features as new. How many times have
they done slurs now in Finale……3 times or something? Every time it's called
something new and listed as a new feature. Or the one year wh
Oh, and boy hasn't that resulted in a TON of great products and updates from
MakeMusic….I mean, MusicXML is taking the world by storm…..
--
On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
> On 2012-07-04 20:35, Henry Howey wrote:
> > I'm noticing that several of the tools ar
i COMPLETELY disagree with the idea that it could benefit the user
community if MM acquired TGTools, expecting it would simply become
yet another sister in the family of dis-functionality that is never
quite up to par. linked parts (partly broken in 6 versions now)?
score manager? dozens of
On 2012-07-04 20:35, Henry Howey wrote:
> I'm noticing that several of the tools are now inoperable.
>
> MakeMusic MUST acquire and maintain TGTOOLS. I'm sure Garritan
> and MusicXML were not cheap. TGTOOLS would be much less.
Gary and Michael became a part of the MM staff as part of the merger
w
I can't help thinking that if MM ever had a handle on how we worked with
Finale, they might have integrated the kinds of plug-ins and innovations we
have come to depend on Tobias for. They are indispensable, indeed. I would not
assume that MM could pick up where he left off or "maintain" TGTools
I tossed this out a couple weeks back and only heard from Chuck. Has anyone
had ANY contact at all with Tobias regarding the status of TGTools? I
wholeheartedly agree with everyone here who finds them indispensable to our
work flow, and I would be more than happy to pay an upgrade fee to keep
alf
Of
> Aaron Sherber
> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 12:43 PM
> To: finale@shsu.edu
> Subject: Re: [Finale] TGTOOLS in 2012b
>
> For the benefit of the MM employees on this list, I have to say that I
completely
> agree. TGTools is an absolutely essential part of my workflow
For the benefit of the MM employees on this list, I have to say that I
completely agree. TGTools is an absolutely essential part of my
workflow, in ways large and small.
Aaron.
On 7/4/2012 2:35 PM, Henry Howey wrote:
> I'm noticing that several of the tools are now inoperable.
>
> MakeMusic MUS
Indeed. It would have made MORE sense to acquire TGTools than the also-ran
Garritan.
--
On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Chuck Israels wrote:
>
> On Jul 4, 2012, at 11:35 AM, Henry Howey wrote:
>
> > I'm noticing that several of the tools are now inoperable.
> >
> > MakeMusic MUS
On Jul 4, 2012, at 11:35 AM, Henry Howey wrote:
> I'm noticing that several of the tools are now inoperable.
>
> MakeMusic MUST acquire and maintain TGTOOLS.
Is there a way to make a "me too" list and send it to MM to emphasize this
point? It may something about which all serious users of F
Totally agree. TGTools is perhaps one of the only reasons I use Finale over
Sibelius. They are absolutely essential.
--
Eric Dannewitz
Musician/Polymath/Evil Genius
http://www.ericdannewitz.com/
iMessage ericdannew...@me.com
On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Henry Howey wrote:
> I'm no
I'm noticing that several of the tools are now inoperable.
MakeMusic MUST acquire and maintain TGTOOLS. I'm sure Garritan and MusicXML
were not cheap. TGTOOLS would be much less.
Henry Howey
Sent from my iWhatever
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu
25 matches
Mail list logo
