Jonathan Smith wrote:
I saw this on the An Overgrown Path Blog yesterday:
The renowned conductor Robert King (above),
Couldn't this really have be marked as an OT subject?
Yes, and so should your complaint. :-)
And I'm not sure what the purpose of the original message was -- I read
On 7/14/06, dhbailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and was disappointed not to anything remotely related to FinaleWell not exactly. Mr. King is an early music performer/conductor.
His group performed the Lionel Sawkins edition that was the topic of discussion (which wasn't directly Finale
Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
On 7/14/06, *dhbailey* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and was disappointed not to anything remotely related to Finale
Well not exactly. Mr. King is an early music performer/conductor.
His group performed the Lionel Sawkins edition that was the
Ah...who was it that said the list was dead the other day?
Ah...who was it that said the list was dead the other day?
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
dhbailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the Sawkins topic was of importance to many Finale users because of the copyright issues involved.
Robert King's group that performed the music that was involoved in the Sawkin's case.
So, yes there is a connection between news about Robert King and classical
Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
*dhbailey* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the Sawkins topic was of importance to many Finale users because of the
copyright issues involved.
Robert King's group that performed the music that was involoved in the
Sawkin's case.
So, yes there is a
The Robert King post could have been labeled OT, but it's no big deal,
considering the threads we get into here. The list often discusses many
areas pertaining to serious music not directly relating to Finale.
The list will survive and thrive.
Perhaps it is time to move on?
RBH
Kim
While I fully expected the Robert King posting (I had never heard of
him, BTW) to generate much discussion, I was absolutely astounded at
the form that discussion has taken, with nose-in-the-air sniffing about
gossip and inappropriateness.
I thought we'd gotten rid of this kind of attitude
Andrew Stiller wrote:
[snip]
Oh, I forgot, that's all just prurient. No possible connection to us
*honest* musicians.
Well here's a shock: just about every country on earth has sex crimes
on the books that should not be crimes at all. Now, I may be wrong, but
it looks very much to me as if
Well said, Andrew,
JR
On 7/14/06 2:06 PM, Andrew Stiller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I fully expected the Robert King posting (I had never heard of
him, BTW) to generate much discussion, I was absolutely astounded at
the form that discussion has taken, with nose-in-the-air sniffing about
On 14 Jul 2006 at 14:06, Andrew Stiller wrote:
But see, what happened to King, or something similar, could happen to
*you* tomorrow.
All true, yes. But there are literally millions of such topics that
are relevant to *everyone in the world*, but have nothing directly to
do with *Finale*.
Thanks, Andrew.
Raymond Horton
Andrew Stiller wrote:
While I fully expected the Robert King posting (I had never heard of
him, BTW) to generate much discussion, I was absolutely astounded at
the form that discussion has taken, with nose-in-the-air sniffing
about gossip and
12 matches
Mail list logo
