On 27 Nov 2006, at 10:49 AM, John Howell wrote:
At 10:18 PM -0500 11/26/06, Darcy James Argue wrote:
And since Robert's Copyists Helper doesn't fully support linked
parts (MM's fault, not his), you lose the ability to have the
*current* instrument name displayed in the page header -- i.e.,
At 10:18 PM -0500 11/26/06, Darcy James Argue wrote:
And since Robert's Copyists Helper doesn't fully support linked
parts (MM's fault, not his), you lose the ability to have the
*current* instrument name displayed in the page header -- i.e., for
a part that begins on flute but switches to so
On 26 Nov 2006, at 9:32 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
Don't Bill's custom staff styles take care of the current
instrument name?
I use my own staff styles, not Bill's, but neither one solves the
problem I'm talking about -- page headers (not staff names).
The problem is there is no insert for
On Nov 26, 2006, at 6:00 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 26 Nov 2006, at 4:07 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
Why, Darcy? I've done this forever with no untoward incidents.
I've had tremendous problems in the past, especially with measure-
attached expressions,
Oh yes, Darcy. I remember this
On 26 Nov 2006, at 4:07 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
Why, Darcy? I've done this forever with no untoward incidents.
I've had tremendous problems in the past, especially with measure-
attached expressions, staff styles, clef changes, and so on. I've
tried to join individual files of multi-move
On Nov 26, 2006, at 12:40 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 26 Nov 2006, at 3:33 PM, Robert Patterson wrote:
On 11/26/06, Chuck Israels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The main time consumer for me has to do with how long each part
layout takes when there is no way (as far as I have been able to
On 26 Nov 2006, at 3:33 PM, Robert Patterson wrote:
On 11/26/06, Chuck Israels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The main time consumer for me has to do with how long each part
layout takes when there is no way (as far as I have been able to
figure out) to use one part as a template for another simi
On 11/26/06, Chuck Israels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The main time consumer for me has to do with how long each part
layout takes when there is no way (as far as I have been able to
figure out) to use one part as a template for another similar one.
I went back and reviewed the old thread on
On Nov 26, 2006, at 10:34 AM, dhbailey wrote:
Williams, Jim wrote:
[snip]>
Chuck, if the light goes on for you, please hit me over the head
with it.
Before I sent 2007 back, I reached the conclusion that the linked
parts thing was right for a certain class of user--a class of user
to which
On Nov 26, 2006, at 8:01 AM, Robert Patterson wrote:
Chuck Israels wrote:
I continue to stumble on difficulties that seem to be more
trouble than I used to
Such as (beyond the beam angles, etc. we've discussed)?
Robert,
The main time consumer for me has to do with how long each part
l
Williams, Jim wrote:
[snip]>
Chuck, if the light goes on for you, please hit me over the head with it.
Before I sent 2007 back, I reached the conclusion that the linked
parts thing was right for a certain class of user--a class of user to which
I don't seem to belong. While my determination does
At 11:06 AM 11/26/2006, Robert Patterson wrote:
>Early on there was much discussion of this issue in a different forum
>than this one, and I was given to understand that there is workflow that
>allows it. But I have not figured it out either. Perhaps Aaron Sherber
>or Darcy will chime in, because
Chuck Israels wrote:
Certain kinds of music make the
use of one part serving as a template for other parts a real time saver
in the layout process,
Early on there was much discussion of this issue in a different forum
than this one, and I was given to understand that there is workflow that
Chuck Israels wrote:
I continue to stumble
on difficulties that seem to be more trouble than I used to
Such as (beyond the beam angles, etc. we've discussed)?
If the end result is the same, and the new
method simply takes longer, I'm not sure it is helping my workflow.
When I first pla
Chuck wrote:
I can certainly understand the value of one document as opposed to
many. That's why I am struggling to change established work habits
in order to accommodate the inherent advantages, but I continue to
stumble on difficulties that seem to be more trouble than I used to
hav
Thank you for the suggestions Robert,
Splitting parts in the score should make it possible to accomplish
most of what I need to do. For some reason, that had not occurred to
me, obvious as it is in retrospect.
I can certainly understand the value of one document as opposed to
many. That
Good news Darcy. I'm going to try this on the affected parts.
Thanks,
Chuck
On Nov 25, 2006, at 6:34 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Chuck,
Extracted parts inherit the appearance of the existing linked part
at the time of extraction. You should (theoretically) be able to
work with linked
On 11/25/06, Chuck Israels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Me too, and it is frustrating. Seems to me there are two choices:
wait for a maintenance update in the hope that these matters are
addressed, or extract parts the old way and lose the advantages of
the linked parts (not so much of an advant
Chuck Israels wrote:
On Nov 25, 2006, at 1:31 PM, dhbailey wrote:
Chuck Israels wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone had success adjusting beam angles on linked parts
generated from splitting notes on one staff (i.e. Alto Sax 1 - Alto
Sax 2). I don't seem to be able to access the beams with either a
Chuck,
Extracted parts inherit the appearance of the existing linked part at
the time of extraction. You should (theoretically) be able to work
with linked parts for as long as that makes sense, then extract out
and finish your work in the separate documents, without losing any of
the pre
On Nov 25, 2006, at 1:31 PM, dhbailey wrote:
Chuck Israels wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone had success adjusting beam angles on linked parts
generated from splitting notes on one staff (i.e. Alto Sax 1 -
Alto Sax 2). I don't seem to be able to access the beams with
either a plugin or the Spec
Chuck Israels wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone had success adjusting beam angles on linked parts generated
from splitting notes on one staff (i.e. Alto Sax 1 - Alto Sax 2). I
don't seem to be able to access the beams with either a plugin or the
Special Tools/Beam Angle Tool. Of course, this cannot
22 matches
Mail list logo
