Keith Helgesen wrote:
I doubt Beethoven had six days to arrange, rehearse and perform- but then
again- he was a genius.
It may have been helpful in this, too, that he was deaf.
ns
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailm
On Sep 29, 2004, at 6:24 AM, John Howell wrote:
As always, quick and helpful replies. But I'm struck by how set we
get in our ways. Why "should" it be in 6/8?Why is it "odd" to
read it in 6/4. Of course I do a lot of early music, and one has to
get used to interpreting notes that look big
L PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Howell
Sent: Wednesday, 29 September 2004 11:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Finale] Half time! (not Football!)
At 6:28 PM +1000 9/29/04, Keith Helgesen wrote:
>I have done a piece in 6/4 time- as the original given to me. It
>really should be in 6/8-
On Sep 29, 2004, at 6:24 AM, John Howell wrote:
At 6:28 PM +1000 9/29/04, Keith Helgesen wrote:
I have done a piece in 6/4 time- as the original given to me. It really should be in 6/8- it's very odd to read in 6/4. How do I 'convert' it?
I know about changing note durations- (m.m.-change-duratio
At 6:28 PM +1000 9/29/04, Keith Helgesen wrote:
I have done a piece in 6/4 time- as the original given to me. It
really should be in 6/8- it's very odd to read in 6/4. How do I
'convert' it?
I know about changing note durations- (m.m.-change-duration) and I
know about changing time sigs- but how
Keith Helgesen wrote:
I have done a piece in 6/4 time- as the original given to me. It really
should be in 6/8- it’s very odd to read in 6/4. How do I ‘convert’ it?
I know about changing note durations- (m.m.-change-duration) and I know
about changing time sigs- but how to do both at once??
It'
