Re: [Finale] JW plug-ins open source

2004-10-09 Thread dhbailey
John Poole [Finale Discussion] wrote: Mark D Lew wrote: On Oct 8, 2004, at 1:48 PM, Brad Beyenhof wrote: It seems he's not. This is taken from the page he linked to in his announcement: These source code files are released as "open source" and can be compiled to a Finale(TM) plug-in, with the fol

Re: [Finale] JW plug-ins open source

2004-10-08 Thread John Poole [Finale Discussion]
Mark D Lew wrote: On Oct 8, 2004, at 1:48 PM, Brad Beyenhof wrote: It seems he's not. This is taken from the page he linked to in his announcement: These source code files are released as "open source" and can be compiled to a Finale(TM) plug-in, with the following remarks/limitations: * This

Re: [Finale] JW plug-ins open source

2004-10-08 Thread Mark D Lew
On Oct 8, 2004, at 1:48 PM, Brad Beyenhof wrote: It seems he's not. This is taken from the page he linked to in his announcement: These source code files are released as "open source" and can be compiled to a Finale(TM) plug-in, with the following remarks/limitations: * This source code is co

Re: [Finale] JW plug-ins open source

2004-10-08 Thread Brad Beyenhof
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 14:41:19 -0400, Darcy James Argue wrote: > I should add that a number of us would gladly *pay* for Mac versions of > these plugins (that is, if Jari's okay with that). It seems he's not. This is taken from the page he linked to in his announcement: These source code files are r

Re: [Finale] JW plug-ins open source

2004-10-08 Thread JD
You betcha!! *** J.D. Thomas ThomaStudios West Linn OR http://www.thomastudios.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Top sign an SUV is too damn big: Backing out of the driveway requires canal locks, four tugboats, a team of engineers, and clearance from

Re: [Finale] JW plug-ins open source

2004-10-08 Thread Chuck Israels
Sure, me too. Chuck On Oct 8, 2004, at 11:41 AM, Darcy James Argue wrote: I should add that a number of us would gladly *pay* for Mac versions of these plugins (that is, if Jari's okay with that). - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brooklyn, NY On 08 Oct 2004, at 02:35 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:

Re: [Finale] JW plug-ins open source

2004-10-08 Thread Darcy James Argue
I should add that a number of us would gladly *pay* for Mac versions of these plugins (that is, if Jari's okay with that). - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brooklyn, NY On 08 Oct 2004, at 02:35 PM, Chuck Israels wrote: If the unbridled generosity of the folks on this list continues unabated, some

Re: [Finale] JW plug-ins open source

2004-10-08 Thread Chuck Israels
If the unbridled generosity of the folks on this list continues unabated, someone will surely step up. Chuck On Oct 8, 2004, at 11:32 AM, Darcy James Argue wrote: Hi Chuck, Uh, that would be "no," unfortunately. But it means that now the people who do know can now get started. - Darcy - [

Re: [Finale] JW plug-ins open source

2004-10-08 Thread Darcy James Argue
Hi Chuck, Uh, that would be "no," unfortunately. But it means that now the people who do know can now get started. - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brooklyn, NY On 08 Oct 2004, at 02:28 PM, Chuck Israels wrote: Darcy, Does this mean that you have the know how to port Jari's plug ins over to the

Re: [Finale] JW plug-ins open source

2004-10-08 Thread Chuck Israels
Darcy, Does this mean that you have the know how to port Jari's plug ins over to the Mac side of things? Chuck On Oct 8, 2004, at 9:32 AM, Darcy James Argue wrote: THANK YOU, JARI!!! Cheers, - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brooklyn, NY On 08 Oct 2004, at 10:58 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote: Hel

Re: [Finale] JW plug-ins open source

2004-10-08 Thread Darcy James Argue
THANK YOU, JARI!!! Cheers, - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brooklyn, NY On 08 Oct 2004, at 10:58 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote: Hello! I'll now start to release some of my freeware plug-ins as "open source", so anyone with a MacOSX compiler can make a port. I've started with "JW System Divider" to see