On 4/2/02 5:34 PM, "Olaf Foellinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04.02.02 07:07]wrote:
>
>> At 22:55 Uhr +0100 03.02.2002, Olaf Foellinger wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The patch that makes slrn/slang working doesn't install. I've
>>> reinstalled fink from scratch but
* Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04.02.02 07:07]wrote:
> At 22:55 Uhr +0100 03.02.2002, Olaf Foellinger wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >The patch that makes slrn/slang working doesn't install. I've
> >reinstalled fink from scratch but the bug still appears.
>
> You are not giving much information, you shoul
On Sunday, February 3, 2002, at 05:21 pm, Max Horn wrote:
> At 23:03 Uhr +0100 03.02.2002, Olaf Foellinger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> when I try to call gpg I get
>>
>> % gpg
>> dyld: gpg can't open library: /sw/lib/libgdbm.2.dylib (No such file
>> or directory, errno = 2)
>>
>> Is it a bug or do i mis
One correction to the earlier proposal. In the section on upgrading, I
should have said:
If shared libraries (or any other files now present
in foo-shlibs) were installed previously, then these new packages should
say
Replaces: foo (<< earliest. compliant.version)
so that upgra
At Peter's suggestion, I am enclosing the info files for libpng and
libpng-shlibs. Perhaps studying them will help folks figure out how
this works. (It certainly took a while for it to sink in, for me!)
There are also patch files, which are identical for the two packages
(and copied from the pr
Great! I think I can finally put gnumeric back into stable, then.
-- Dave
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Good news! Rebuilding gtk+ helped indeed, gnumeric now seems to run just fine!
I hacked together a quick&dirty shell script that finds all libs that
are still linked against 50.0.0. It's quite slow and certainly can be
improved, but for me it served its purpose and I am now rebuilding
all the
Hi Dave,
Could you include an actual example (e.g. libpng) in this
policy. It would make it easier to follow.
It might just be me on a Monday morning, not thinking straight though :)
I think it is good that shared libs are getting sorted out.
Peter
On Monday, February 4, 2002, at 05:25 AM,
(cc'ing the maintainer)
I'm trying to build the new gnome-vfs-ssl and it appears to be
missing a dependency on pkgconfig:
---(snip!)---
checking for pkg-config... no
*** The pkg-config script could not be found. Make sure it is
*** in your path, or set the PKG_CONFIG environment variable
*** to
At 17:28 Uhr -0500 03.02.2002, Alexander Strange wrote:
>If all your libraries are correct, I would suggest running
>sudo update_prebinding -force -verbose -root /
I doubt this will change anything, since that essentially run several
times since I upgraded to 10.1 (and this is my third 10.1 inst
If all your libraries are correct, I would suggest running
sudo update_prebinding -force -verbose -root /
On Sunday, February 3, 2002, at 04:38 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
> Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Max Horn wrote:
>>
>>> /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility
Olaf Foellinger [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> % gpg
> dyld: gpg can't open library: /sw/lib/libgdbm.2.dylib (No such file or directory,
>errno = 2)
It's working fine with me... I'm using mutt and GPG with no problems.
You may want to try rebuilding/reinstalling the 'gdbm' and 'gnupg'
packages.
At 23:03 Uhr +0100 03.02.2002, Olaf Foellinger wrote:
>Hi,
>
>when I try to call gpg I get
>
>% gpg
>dyld: gpg can't open library: /sw/lib/libgdbm.2.dylib (No such file
>or directory, errno = 2)
>
>Is it a bug or do i miss something ?
The stable version of gpg has a missing dependency. For now,
At 22:55 Uhr +0100 03.02.2002, Olaf Foellinger wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The patch that makes slrn/slang working doesn't install. I've
>reinstalled fink from scratch but the bug still appears.
You are not giving much information, you should learn to state all
the information related to your request, that i
At 16:38 Uhr -0500 03.02.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
>Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Max Horn wrote:
>>
>> > /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0,
>> > current version 50.0.0)
>>
>> This is suspicious: The current version of libSystem.dylib is 55
Hi,
when I try to call gpg I get
% gpg
dyld: gpg can't open library: /sw/lib/libgdbm.2.dylib (No such file or directory,
errno = 2)
Is it a bug or do i miss something ?
Greetings Olaf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.so
Hi,
The patch that makes slrn/slang working doesn't install. I've
reinstalled fink from scratch but the bug still appears.
Greetings Olaf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Max Horn wrote:
>
> > /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0,
> > current version 50.0.0)
>
> This is suspicious: The current version of libSystem.dylib is 55.0.0 in
> OSX 10.1.2. I think 50.0.0 is pre-OSX 10.1.
>
If my un
Max Horn wrote:
> /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0,
> current version 50.0.0)
This is suspicious: The current version of libSystem.dylib is 55.0.0 in
OSX 10.1.2. I think 50.0.0 is pre-OSX 10.1.
--
Martin
___
Fink-deve
Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
> 2) The version of tar that comes with OS X (/usr/bin/tar) has a -s
> option that allows you to automatically rename files as they are being
> extracted from the tarball. Also, if there are a lot of files that refer
> to one of the duplicates you're renaming, you can use s
> What about the case where it is the binaries in the package that are
> depended upon?
>
> EG: Some new package might consist of a number of python scripts, thus
> pythonN would be be required.
This part of the policy only applies to packages supplying shared libraries.
As it says a bit furthe
On Monday, February 4, 2002, at 07:25 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
> Depends: barN-shlibs
> BuildDepends: barN
> It will not be permitted for another package to depend on barN itself.
What about the case where it is the binaries in the package that are
depended upon?
EG: Some new package
At 15:25 Uhr -0500 03.02.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
>Based on the discussion which Max and I had on this list yesterday, I have
>drawn up a proposed new policy document for shared libraries in fink.
>If we all agree on this, I would propose to add it to the packaging manual
>as a new subsectio
Based on the discussion which Max and I had on this list yesterday, I have
drawn up a proposed new policy document for shared libraries in fink.
If we all agree on this, I would propose to add it to the packaging manual
as a new subsection 3.3 under Packaging Policy. Your feedback is most
welcome
At 15:17 Uhr -0500 03.02.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
>Just to deepen the mystery: at one time in the past, I had this problem.
>(gnumeric crashing when the mouse moved)
>
>But then I recompiled gtk+ under 10.1 and it seemed to fix the problem.
>I know that it fixed the problem for some other us
Just to deepen the mystery: at one time in the past, I had this problem.
(gnumeric crashing when the mouse moved)
But then I recompiled gtk+ under 10.1 and it seemed to fix the problem.
I know that it fixed the problem for some other users, but not for all
of them.
__
At 12:14 Uhr -0800 03.02.2002, El JoPe Magnifico wrote:
>On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Max Horn wrote:
>> OK, weird. But I see now that I was mistaken regarding gnumeric, I
>> only took a brief glance at the BT, saw "marshal", "signal", "emit"
>> etc. and thought "oh, sigc++". Obviously that was wrong, s
On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Max Horn wrote:
> OK, weird. But I see now that I was mistaken regarding gnumeric, I
> only took a brief glance at the BT, saw "marshal", "signal", "emit"
> etc. and thought "oh, sigc++". Obviously that was wrong, stupid
> little me :)
>
> Anyway, I have latest gnumeric install
At 9:36 Uhr -0500 03.02.2002, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
>On Sunday, February 3, 2002, at 05:29 AM, Max Horn wrote:
>
>>What you should do before you submit a libtool patch:
>>
>>1) Get a non-OS X box, and install the latest libtool source on that
>>2) Run the test suite and verify that all tests pas
At 9:22 Uhr -0500 03.02.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
[...]
>Hi Max. I didn't have libsigc++, gtkmm, or gnomemm installed at all, but
>gnumeric works for me.
>
>I installed them (unstable versions), and gnumeric still works.
>
>I rebuilt gnumeric with these programs installed (in case there wa
On Sunday, February 3, 2002, at 05:29 AM, Max Horn wrote:
> What you should do before you submit a libtool patch:
>
> 1) Get a non-OS X box, and install the latest libtool source on that
> 2) Run the test suite and verify that all tests pass
> 3) Apply your patch, run the test suite still passes
Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gnumeric crashes for me upong launch. never has been different. But
> now also gabber crashes for me when I try to login. Looking at my
> stack trace, both crash inside some gtkmm/gnomemm function... I
> wonder if there is something deeper going on there..
Hi,
Sorry for crossposting. But it should be a widely known.
New version of gal (0.19-1) is available on unstable tree and
it breaks gnumeric and gabber(-ssl). If you are using those
package, please rebuild them with `fink rebuild (gnumeric|gabber)'
after you installed newer gal.
I hope new shl
At 22:03 Uhr -0500 01.02.2002, Bill Bumgarner wrote:
>Did you build the client or the server?
Hm, I think only the client
>The client is trivial; pretty much builds out of the box.
Yup, mostly. It had some nasty problems when I tried, but I believe
they have fixed all of them now.
>The serv
> "Alexander" == Alexander Strange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexander> I have a version of the Gimp with multithreading
Alexander> enabled compiling. I am now working on Perl-Fu support.
Alexander> It seems to want libgimp already installed in
Alexander> /sw/lib. Is there a
At 3:42 Uhr -0500 03.02.2002, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
>I think I have a fix for the libtool convenience library bug, I've
>included a diff to ltmain.sh.
>
>This bug occurs in libtool 1.4 and higher (possibly earlier versions
>too, though I haven't seen that yet). Basically it happens when
>libto
I think I have a fix for the libtool convenience library bug, I've
included a diff to ltmain.sh.
This bug occurs in libtool 1.4 and higher (possibly earlier versions
too, though I haven't seen that yet). Basically it happens when libtool
causes cc to link a "convenience library" with a .al ext
37 matches
Mail list logo
