Hi Dave,
I am not (any more) contesting the splitting into foo and foo-shlibs
packages. I undderstand the rationale behind this decision. What I am
still not liking is the splitting-off of the fo-bin packages.
"David R. Morrison" wrote:
> We need the third package, though, because the binaries
At 22:29 Uhr -0500 24.02.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
[... snipped explanation of why shlibs are good ...]
David, I think you are preaching to the choir here. Martin didn't
argue against the shlibs stuff here, just against the -bin stuff
(which I don't like much myself, but oh well). No need
> Uhm... why not just make the header packages (e.g. orbit) depend on the
> binary package (orbit-bin), which would immediatly solve all the
> strange problems, and in fact might be required anyway in many cases
> (e.g. many unix libs requrie their foo-config apps to be useful for
> developmen
At 1:37 Uhr +0100 25.02.2002, Jorge Acereda Maci· wrote:
>"David R. Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> installed by the 10.1.3 upgrade. I don't know how to check the version
> > number of sh or zsh, which Matthias said was 3.0.8 in his case.
I am running 10.1.3, I have zlib 3.0.8, but gd
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/pythonmac-sig/1042874
It seems Fink is being used by more and more folks that are not
necessarily familiar with Darwin or Unix. Providing them with better
feedback during the installation process would likely make these folks'
lives easier.
b.bum
Okay, what exactly do you mean by better feedback?
Peter
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 11:50 PM, Bill Bumgarner wrote:
> http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/pythonmac-sig/1042874
>
> It seems Fink is being used by more and more folks that are not
> necessarily familiar with Darwin
On lundi, février 25, 2002, at 01:40 , Max Horn wrote:
>
> So i strongly doubt that the system update is the culprit. Rather
> something else that has been changed recently.
>
> Matthias, since when exactly do you have these problems?
My problems are different, but also persistent. I compiled
gd
I enclose a suggested addition to the shared libraries documentation.
I believe that it addresses the problems Martin has uncovered. Any
comments?
-- Dave
Packages containing both binary files and libraries
When an upstream package contains both binary files and libraries, some
care must be
Hi,
Your problems may be a conflict with gtk-doc which Masanori
hasn't noticed yet...
I am sure he'll fix it as and when he gets the time. It is,
after all the unstable tree we are talking about here :)
Am copying him.
Peter
On Tuesday, February 26, 2002, at 12:53 AM, Martin Costabel wrote
On lundi, février 25, 2002, at 05:30 , Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Your problems may be a conflict with gtk-doc which Masanori hasn't
> noticed yet...
Bingo! I removed gtk-doc, and the rebuild of gdk-pixbuf completed
without a hitch. So there should probably be some --disable-gtk-doc
opti
I confirmed it, will track down lator.
I filed this bug report into bug tracker(#522582).
Thanks for reporting.
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 20:48:50 +0100
Kilian Koepsell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i just compiled and installed mozilla 0.9.8-1. very nice!
>
> just one problem: i can't print. the out
Oops, I didn't noticed gdk-pixbuf breakage caused by gtk-doc.
I added --desable-gtk-doc to both gdk-pixbuf and gdk-pixbuf-shlib.
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 18:36:48 +0100
Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Your problems may be a conflict with gtk-doc which Masanori hasn't
>
Your code doesn't look like it's using threads... I missed the early
part of this thread. Did you say that this problem is OS X specific,
for sure?
On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 22:12, Steve Spicklemire wrote:
> Nope.. no help. It's looking like the problem might be that errno is
> being set in one th
Hi Gordon,
Yes.. the same code on Linux, and Win32 works OK. I've actually
tracked it down to a problem with threads and Numeric (another fink
module). Here's a message I just sent to the MacPython folks. I'm just
not sure how I can find out what "resource" is "unavailable". Any hints
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 11:20 , David R. Morrison wrote:
> Packages containing both binary files and libraries
>
> When an upstream package contains both binary files and libraries, some
> care must be exercised in constructing fink packages. In some cases,
> the only binary files will b
On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 14:47, Steve Spicklemire wrote:
> Hi Gordon,
>
> Yes.. the same code on Linux, and Win32 works OK. I've actually
> tracked it down to a problem with threads and Numeric (another fink
> module). Here's a message I just sent to the MacPython folks. I'm just
> not sure
Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, if the errno is coming from a different thread, then OS X, unlike
> most POSIX OS's, probably doesn't have a separate errno for each thread
> (which sorta sucks. a lot). Under Linux, for instance, "errno" is a
> macro which locates the current t
Hi there
I wanted to install lyx but didn't get too far [more after dumps etc]:
[localhost:src/libwww-5.3.2-2/w3c-libwww-5.3.2] root# make
make all-recursive
Making all in config
Making all in modules
Making all in expat
Making all in xmltok
Making all in xmlparse
Making all in md5
Making all i
Well.. that's good news! (I think!) So.. any idea how to find out what
"resource" is temporarily unavailable?
thanks,
-steve
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 07:14 PM, Jorge Acereda Maciá wrote:
> Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Well, if the errno is coming from a different threa
"fink describe lyx" and "fink describe xdvi" will reveal the email addresses
of the maintainers.
The download URL for xdvi was fixed quite some time ago. You need to update
using "fink selfupdate-cvs" and then the corrected xdvi-22.48-1.info file
will be used.
-- Dave
___
Kyle Moffett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 11:20 , David R. Morrison wrote:
> > Packages containing both binary files and libraries
> >
[snip]
>
> I would recommend that the foo package not be foo3. I think that since
> we can only have one foo headers package i
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 07:58 , David R. Morrison wrote:
> Kyle Moffett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 11:20 , David R. Morrison wrote:
>>> Packages containing both binary files and libraries
>>>
> [snip]
>>
>> I would recommend that the foo package not
22 matches
Mail list logo
