Re: [Fink-devel] Package overlap in libmd & openssl-dev

On Sunday, October 13, 2002, at 08:28 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote: > Hi, > > I created a package for libmd (from FreeBSD's md5 library) because > another program I want to port requires it, and there is a small > problem. > > One file overlaps with OpenSSL-dev, a man file: > /sw/share/man/man3/m

[Fink-devel] Package overlap in libmd & openssl-dev

Hi, I created a package for libmd (from FreeBSD's md5 library) because another program I want to port requires it, and there is a small problem. One file overlaps with OpenSSL-dev, a man file: /sw/share/man/man3/md5.3 The openssl with Mac OS X provides a version of this man file too, but

[Fink-devel] Extra processes remain after building a perl module

Any perl gurus out there to help figure this out? Jean-Francois and I both noticed that building my package "net-ssleay-pm" leaves 2 sleeping processes after the end of the build (with no trace of it in the log) : 0 21767 1 0 31 0 1828508 - S p10:00.01 sh -c

Re: [Fink-devel] see kernel boot

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Doe) > But i have not found for what I´m searching for!! I didn't, either :-) -- Xavier http://www.freetibet.org http://www.tibet.fr/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thi

Re: [Fink-devel] faq

On Sunday, October 13, 2002, at 03:05 pm, Ben Hines wrote: the faq says: http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-fink.php#unstable If you only want one or two specific packages, it is safer to copy those .info files (and their associated .patch files, if there are any) from /sw/fink/dists/unstable

Re: [Fink-devel] faq

At 7:05 Uhr -0700 13.10.2002, Ben Hines wrote: the faq says: http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-fink.php#unstable If you only want one or two specific packages, it is safer to copy those .info files (and their associated .patch files, if there are any) from /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finki

Re: [Fink-devel] faq

On Sunday, October 13, 2002, at 11:35 AM, Max Horn wrote: > At 7:05 Uhr -0700 13.10.2002, Ben Hines wrote: >> the faq says: >> http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-fink.php#unstable >>> If you only want one or two specific packages, it is safer to copy >>> those .info files (and their associa

Re: [Fink-devel] Next phase of shlibs project

Ben Hines has asked me in private email why we need the "%n (>= %v-%r)" part of the new Shlibs field. Although I can't give an example of this at the moment, I can explain some future scenarios where this will be used. Suppose that your package builds two shared libraries, libfoo.1.dylib and libb

[Fink-devel] faq

the faq says: http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-fink.php#unstable If you only want one or two specific packages, it is safer to copy those .info files (and their associated .patch files, if there are any) from /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo to /sw/fink/dists/local/main/finkinfo. Do yo

Re: [Fink-devel] Next phase of shlibs project

Thanks for catching the typo, Ben. The correct example is: Shlibs: << %p/lib/libapt-inst.1.0.dylib %n (>= %v-%r) %p/lib/libapt-pkg.3.2.dylib %n (>= %v-%r) << -- Dave --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to g

Re: [Fink-devel] Fortran depend question

Brian: I don't think you need the "No fortran" option - the vanilla LAM-MPI package could depend on g77, the LAM-MPI-absoft variant could depend on system-fortran. I think absoft has the capability of linking g77 libs, so in theory you could get away with one package. Unfortunately, I've never be

Re: [Fink-devel] see kernel boot

Martin : > cmd-v, to be hold down for a while at the beginning of the boot process. Sounds to me that you rather see the _system_ (aka userland in BSDs) booting. -- Xavier http://www.freetibet.org http://www.tibet.fr/ --- This sf.net email i