Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Fink Needs You

2002-11-16 Thread Ben Hines
On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 09:37 PM, Steven Burr wrote: I'm not crazy about this idea. What if a user discovers a problem with a stable package and wants to let the maintainer know? Why should he prevented from using FinkCommander to do that? Then that user clicks the maintainer

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Fink Needs You

2002-11-16 Thread Steven Burr
On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 07:11 PM, Ben Hines wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 11:43 AM, Max Horn wrote: Maybe we should ask the fink commander author to restrict reports only on packages that are actually *not* in stable? Or even if it is in stable, refuse if the last CV

Re: [Fink-devel] About Fonts

2002-11-16 Thread Alexander Strange
On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 10:54 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 10:53 PM, Alexander Strange wrote: No. XFree86 still provides Xft. We just provides its dependencies. Xft2 is part of fontconfig. Then we symlink it to /usr/X11R6/lib? Not sure what to do a

Re: [Fink-devel] About Fonts

2002-11-16 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 10:53 PM, Alexander Strange wrote: No. XFree86 still provides Xft. We just provides its dependencies. Xft2 is part of fontconfig. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing you

Re: [Fink-devel] About Fonts

2002-11-16 Thread Alexander Strange
On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 10:16 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 07:08 PM, Alexander Strange wrote: We don't really have to worry about this until XFree86 4.3, but... * XFree86 will be using the Fontconfig library. We should package our own version of thi

Re: [Fink-devel] About Fonts

2002-11-16 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 07:08 PM, Alexander Strange wrote: We don't really have to worry about this until XFree86 4.3, but... * XFree86 will be using the Fontconfig library. We should package our own version of this, patch it to recognize /sw/lib/X11/fonts, and tell XFree86 to buil

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Fink Needs You

2002-11-16 Thread Ben Hines
On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 11:43 AM, Max Horn wrote: At 17:22 Uhr -0800 14.11.2002, Ben Hines wrote: If you are using any fink package on 10.2 that is not listed in "stable" in FinkCommander or http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/index.php (current-stable), please let the maintainer kno

Re: [Fink-devel] library compatibility version

2002-11-16 Thread David R. Morrison
Well, after thinking about this for a few hours, I've reached the opposite conclusion. I think we will have a more powerful system if we change the format of the Shlibs field to include the compatibility version. Here's how it would work (very similar to debian, actually: see http://www.debian.

[Fink-devel] About Fonts

2002-11-16 Thread Alexander Strange
We don't really have to worry about this until XFree86 4.3, but... * XFree86 will be using the Fontconfig library. We should package our own version of this, patch it to recognize /sw/lib/X11/fonts, and tell XFree86 to build with it. * We may want to make our freetype2 build with ftmac support (

[Fink-devel] Problems with aria

2002-11-16 Thread Jeremy Higgs
Hi everyone! I'm trying to compile aria (0.10.0 and 0.10.2test7) on 10.2.2, and I'm getting this: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -isystem /sw/include -O2 -Wall -DLOCALEDIR=\"/sw/share/locale\" -DDATADIR=\"/sw/share\" -I../intl -I/sw/include/gtk-1.2 -I/sw/include/glib-1.2 -I/sw/lib/glib/in

[Fink-devel] library compatibility version

2002-11-16 Thread David R. Morrison
Hi Max and other Fink developers. I bumped into a problem today with compatibility versions of libs, and realized that I had been overlooking that aspect of the shlibs project. What happened was, I had some debs which I made on my iBook, and to save time, I copied them onto the iMac and installed

[Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Fink Needs You

2002-11-16 Thread Max Horn
At 17:22 Uhr -0800 14.11.2002, Ben Hines wrote: If you are using any fink package on 10.2 that is not listed in "stable" in FinkCommander or http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/index.php (current-stable), please let the maintainer know. We're not asking for a full QA report or even testing of ever

[Fink-devel] help needed with testing

2002-11-16 Thread David R. Morrison
Peter and I realized today that his "dlcompat" package needs a splitoff version. This has now been put into the 10.2/unstable tree, and at the same time, dlcompat-dev was added as a "BuildDepends" in many packages, but only in the unstable tree. Please help us test this, so that we can move it to

Re: [Fink-devel] openldap-ssl

2002-11-16 Thread jfm
On Saturday, Nov 16, 2002, at 14:41 Europe/Brussels, jfm wrote: In addition, I just re-built with fink-cvs, no apparent trouble there either... So now you can get either log file.. But after removing openldap-ssl-*, I get same errors as you. The compilation seems to take too many symbols from

[Fink-devel] Re: poll d/l fail

2002-11-16 Thread Finlay Dobbie
On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 01:43 PM, Finlay Dobbie wrote: curl -f -L -O http://www.clapper.org/software/poll/poll-emulator-1.2.tar.gz curl: (6) Couldn't resolve host 'www.clapper.org' ### execution of curl failed, exit code 6 Downloading the file "poll-emulator-1.2.tar.gz" failed. Look

[Fink-devel] poll d/l fail

2002-11-16 Thread Finlay Dobbie
curl -f -L -O http://www.clapper.org/software/poll/poll-emulator-1.2.tar.gz curl: (6) Couldn't resolve host 'www.clapper.org' ### execution of curl failed, exit code 6 Downloading the file "poll-emulator-1.2.tar.gz" failed. Looks like clapper.org is down. -- Finlay --

Re: [Fink-devel] openldap-ssl

2002-11-16 Thread jfm
On Saturday, Nov 16, 2002, at 05:15 Europe/Brussels, David R. Morrison wrote: Has anyone been able to build openldap-ssl under 10.2? I can't get it to build... But if you have it, I'd appreciate it if somebody could send me the deb files (for both openldap-ssl and openldap-ssl-shlibs). I send

Re: [Fink-devel] openldap-ssl

2002-11-16 Thread Xavier HUMBERT
[cc to to port's maintainer] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David R. Morrison) wrote : > Has anyone been able to build openldap-ssl under 10.2? I can't get it to > build... B I can't either : > ld: Undefined symbols: > _ldap_url_search > make[2]: *** [ltest] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [all-common] Error 1 > ma