Re: [Fink-devel] future of Fink

2002-11-26 Thread Matt Stephenson
This would be a lot easier if OmniWeb stopped calling everything it downloaded from the trackers "download.php". Can this be fixed? I am incredibly annoyed by that as well. It is a bug in their server, i believe, but they don't seem to care: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=5688

Re: [Fink-devel] future of Fink

2002-11-26 Thread Ben Hines
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 06:05 PM, Jeremy Erwin wrote: On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 08:36 PM, Ben Hines wrote: Anyone is welcome to check out submitted packages on the submission tracker, even if you cant commit it, you can check the packages for obvious things like shared library

Re: [Fink-devel] Problem with texinfo.

2002-11-26 Thread David R. Morrison
The download URL for texinfo-4.2 was changed several days ago. Please run "fink selfupdate-cvs" to get an updated version of the fink .info file for this package, which will find the source at the correct location. -- Dave --- This SF.net em

[Fink-devel] Problem with texinfo.

2002-11-26 Thread Andrea Riciputi
Hi, there is a problem with fink's texinfo. Version 4.2 doesn't exist anymore and it has been replaced by v4.3. As a result I'm not able to install a lot of software that require texinfo, such as gnuplot, swig and so on... By the way, I've noticed that I've already texinfo installed on my syst

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool "module" behavior and darwin

2002-11-26 Thread Nick Hudson
On Monday 25 November 2002 2:43 pm, Max Horn wrote: > An alternate solution might be to change the kbackgammon exectuable > to load the kbackgammon.so, too, instead of linking against it. Or is > there anything else that needs to link against these loadable modules? Why? What benefit is there in