Check out my tiny fink-utility in the experimental tree. Send me
suggestions/love-mail/hate-mail, etc.
BTW, would someone explain to me what the "/sw/fink/debs" is for? Is it
just a convenient place to refer to all the debs, or is it really used
by fink? (Mine is continually mixed up because
It is more than the Source Forge Product of the Month:
for I cannot describe in one message the vastness of body of software
fink opens to the OS X user.
In sum, it makes the Mac simply the most versatile, powerful desktop
Unix on the market, bar none.
Thank you.
-
Yeah, that was just a typo.
-Ben
On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 05:49 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Shouldn't the order on the pdb web pages be: unstable, stable, 0.5.0a,
0.4.1?
(I think that's what it was for a while yesterday, but now 0.4.1 is
coming
before 0.5.0a).
-- Dave
Shouldn't the order on the pdb web pages be: unstable, stable, 0.5.0a, 0.4.1?
(I think that's what it was for a while yesterday, but now 0.4.1 is coming
before 0.5.0a).
-- Dave
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek h
On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 02:26 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
On lundi, déc 9, 2002, at 09:05 Europe/Paris, Ben Hines wrote:
It would be pretty easy to just delete anything from packages from
thats not in releases.sql. But it should probably just be added to
the fink release sync process
On lundi, déc 9, 2002, at 09:05 Europe/Paris, Ben Hines wrote:
It would be pretty easy to just delete anything from packages from
thats not in releases.sql. But it should probably just be added to the
fink release sync process. Maybe i'll add that tomorrow.
Whatever you did, the bogus xfree86-
On Sunday, December 8, 2002, at 11:35 PM, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
Doesn't the pdb auto-update with a script daily? If that's the case,
why not just look for old ones and DELETE them from that script?
It would be pretty easy to just delete anything from packages from
thats not in releases.
