Re: [Fink-devel] selfupdate-cvs; small patch

2002-12-28 Thread Martin Costabel
Bill Bumgarner wrote: [] Yes-- but the default for Fink is not to do that and I would bet that most of the users that use selfupdate-cvs have no CLUE about ~/.cvsrc. The default for Fink should be to spew only the information that is actually informative-- the current behavior does not do tha

Re: [Fink-devel] selfupdate-cvs; small patch

2002-12-28 Thread Xavier HUMBERT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Costabel) wrote : > If this is true, it's a bug in the upgrade procedure you used. I cannot > believe it is really "every package" in 10.1. Aren't these only very old > packages that are no longer even in 10.1 cvs? Usually this happens when > your CVS/Entries files get ou

Re: [Fink-devel] selfupdate-cvs; small patch

2002-12-28 Thread Martin Costabel
Let's see if we can find out why this happens. Xavier HUMBERT wrote: [] Just now, I gave a try : "?" accepted for .DS_Store, which I should put in a .cvsignore :-) Yes, this is Finder garbage. su xavier -c 'cvs -z3 update -d -P' ? .DS_Store ? 10.2/.DS_Store ? 10.2/test ? 10.2/experimental/.D

Re: [Fink-devel] selfupdate-cvs; small patch

2002-12-28 Thread Bill Bumgarner
On Saturday, Dec 28, 2002, at 06:13 US/Eastern, Martin Costabel wrote: Bill Bumgarner wrote: [] Yes-- but the default for Fink is not to do that and I would bet that most of the users that use selfupdate-cvs have no CLUE about ~/.cvsrc. The default for Fink should be to spew only the informa

Re: [Fink-devel] bundle-gnome-1.4-13

2002-12-28 Thread Alexander Strange
On Saturday, December 28, 2002, at 12:01 AM, Matt Beato wrote: Failed with this error - gtkselection.c: In function `gtk_selection_notify': gtkselection.c:1190: warning: `length' might be used uninitialized in this function /var/tmp//ccwujaLF.s:unknown:FATAL:can't create output file: .libs/gt

Re: [Fink-devel] selfupdate-cvs; small patch

2002-12-28 Thread Christian Schaffner
On Samstag, Dezember 28, 2002, at 05:26 Uhr, Bill Bumgarner wrote: A new patch: Index: perlmod/Fink/SelfUpdate.pm === RCS file: /cvsroot/fink/fink/perlmod/Fink/SelfUpdate.pm,v retrieving revision 1.24 diff -r1.24 SelfUpdate.pm 336c

[Fink-devel] Ok to use gcc for packages now?

2002-12-28 Thread Carsten Klapp
Hi, Are packages being added from the 10.2 tree into the 10.1 tree or are the 10.1 fink packages frozen now? What I'm getting at is, for new package submissions and updates is it ok to build with gcc or should we still be compiling explicitly with cc? Thanks, Carsten ---

Re: [Fink-devel] selfupdate-cvs; small patch

2002-12-28 Thread Martin Costabel
Bill Bumgarner wrote: [] This has happened on every fink installation I have ever done-- many, many times. I have followed the instructions to the letter on the 'install on Jaguar' guide and 'fink selfupdate-cvs' has always produced a huge slew of the "? ..." OK, I see this now. It's a featu

Re: [Fink-devel] selfupdate-cvs; small patch

2002-12-28 Thread Justin Hallett
I agree with the verbose level, no need although adding it to -q would be easy enough though I still say the output needs to get processed. I'll work on that patch on monday. Can someone open a feature request for it and assign it to me "TheSin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I don't see the point o

Re: [Fink-devel] selfupdate-cvs; small patch

2002-12-28 Thread Bill Bumgarner
On Saturday, Dec 28, 2002, at 12:52 US/Eastern, Martin Costabel wrote: Unfortunately, cvs does not have a cleanup option, "cvs update --delete" or something. For a clean solution, one would have to write a script that removes those files that are marked "?" by cvs update, something equivalent t

Re: [Fink-devel] selfupdate-cvs; small patch

2002-12-28 Thread Justin Hallett
I will also see if I can come up with a good solution for this as well. on monday :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >On Saturday, Dec 28, 2002, at 12:52 US/Eastern, Martin Costabel wrote: >> Unfortunately, cvs does not have a cleanup option, "cvs update >> --delete" or something. For a clean solution,

Re: [Fink-devel] selfupdate-cvs; small patch

2002-12-28 Thread Xavier HUMBERT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Costabel) > Or you did something dramatic such as removing all the CVS directories > in /sw/fink/ and then "fink selfupdate-cvs", a procedure that is > recommended as a remedy for corrupted CVS directories. This would have > the effect you are seeing. According to your re

Re: [Fink-devel] selfupdate-cvs; small patch

2002-12-28 Thread Carsten Klapp
Sounds good, I agree with Bill. In my own copy of fink I have been using cvs -q too without any problems. To see a verbose cvs output one could always just manually update (cd /sw/fink/dists;cvs up). ck On Saturday, December 28, 2002, at 11:26 am, Bill Bumgarner wrote: I don't see the point

Re: [Fink-devel] selfupdate-cvs; small patch

2002-12-28 Thread Justin Hallett
I disagree 100% which this, as some users may not know how, and it'd be harder for us to help, when I make the patch using fink -q selfupdate-cvs will be the only way to quiet it, any other way will show the changes and will log the rest an on an error will be asked to save a cvs dump. [EMAIL PROT

[Fink-devel] Msyslogd

2002-12-28 Thread Chris Behar
I have bee working on porting a new syslog daemon called Modular Syslogd http://sourceforge.net/projects/msyslog/. It is based on the BSD version however this one support many cool features like tcp connections, MD5 message integrety, and MySQL logging. This would be a great addition to the fink p

Re: [Fink-devel] Msyslogd

2002-12-28 Thread Ben Hines
On Saturday, December 28, 2002, at 04:40 PM, Chris Behar wrote: not in the /dev directory like /var/slog. I have concluded that the problem lies in the way we try to create this socket. You would probably get a better response on the darwin-devel list. Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://ww