Comparing trees, I find 3 different versions of findbugs
findbugs:
0.6.0-2 10.2/stable/devel, 10.2-gcc3.3/stable/devel,
10.3/stable/devel, 10.3/unstable/devel
0.6.6-1 10.2-gcc3.3/unstable/devel
0.7.0-1 10.2/unstable/devel, 10.3/local/devel
The
Hi
I corrected my sources.list like mentioned, but it failed on the current
path when apt-get update . packages.gz is not found.
--
Hubertus Krogmann Telefónica Deutschland GmbH
Application Managerhttp://www.telefonica.de
Databases
Am 13.11.2003 um 13:29 schrieb Hubertus Krogmann:
Hi
I corrected my sources.list like mentioned, but it failed on the
current
path when apt-get update . packages.gz is not found.
my sources.list:
deb file:/sw/fink local main
#deb file:/sw/fink stable main crypto
deb file:/sw/fink unstable main
Did you run "fink scanpackages"? That's what actually builds the
Packages.gz files.
On Thursday, November 13, 2003, at 07:45 AM, Hubertus Krogmann wrote:
Am 13.11.2003 um 13:29 schrieb Hubertus Krogmann:
Hi
I corrected my sources.list like mentioned, but it failed on the
current
path when
Thanks very much for pointing this out. The binary distribution is currently
being updated, and I had missed one necessary step in the update process,
which your message pointed out!
As soon as the sourceforge mirrors catch up, you should be able to successfully
complete the "apt-get update" oper
On Nov 12, 2003, at 10:05 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
I plan to release version 0.17.0 of the package manager from CVS HEAD
around 24 hours from now.
Also,
if anyone is aware of things in HEAD which are inappropriate for the
next release, please let me know ASAP.
Since before ~nov 5, the UpdateP
Am 13.11.2003 um 16:11 schrieb David R. Morrison:
Thanks very much for pointing this out. The binary distribution is
currently
being updated, and I had missed one necessary step in the update
process,
which your message pointed out!
As soon as the sourceforge mirrors catch up, you should be ab
OK, I'm awake now:
Under Fink, you have to build unstable packages from source ("fink
install")--such packages aren't released as binaries.
On Thursday, November 13, 2003, at 12:06 PM, Hubertus Krogmann wrote:
Am 13.11.2003 um 16:11 schrieb David R. Morrison:
Thanks very much for pointing this
On Nov 13, 2003, at 6:47 PM, TheSin wrote:
I'll look at the code. but it might expect perllocal.pod to be at a
certain location and it might not be there?
Yes _ eg in the log of rec-descent-pm :
/bin/cat
/sw/src/root-rec-descent-pm-1.80-5/sw/lib/perl5/5.8.1/darwin-thread-
multi-2level/perllo
ahh the arch dir is killing it, do you still have the build dir...or
main root dir if so can you tell me where the perllocal.pod file
resides in a 581 pkg pleasE?
On 13-Nov-03, at 10:56 AM, jfm wrote:
/bin/cat
/sw/src/root-rec-descent-pm-1.80-5/sw/lib/perl5/5.8.1/darwin-thread-
multi-2leve
Am Donnerstag, 13.11.03 um 17:27 Uhr schrieb Benjamin Reed:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/fink
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv18964
Added Files:
NEWS
Log Message:
resurrected having "NEWS" that's a summary of changes for release
--- NEW FILE: NEWS ---
* On Mac OS X 10.3 packages using a
On Nov 13, 2003, at 7:18 PM, TheSin wrote:
ahh the arch dir is killing it, do you still have the build dir...or
main root dir if so can you tell me where the perllocal.pod file
resides in a 581 pkg pleasE?
On 13-Nov-03, at 10:56 AM, jfm wrote:
/bin/cat
/sw/src/root-rec-descent-pm-1.80-5/sw
On Nov 13, 2003, at 7:21 PM, jfm wrote:
Rebuilding it now _ but the error msg basically tells it:
dpkg: error processing
/sw/fink/dists/33/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/perlmods/rec-
descent-pm_1.80-5_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install):
trying to overwrite `/sw/lib/perl5/darwin/perllocal.pod',
how does this look?? Best idea i could come up with I'll commit and
you can try it out, this should also help is for some odd reason there
are multi perllocal.pod files being installed
for i in `find /sw/src/root-xml-parser-pm581-2.31-1/sw -name
perllocal.pod`; do /bin/cat $i | sed -e
s,/
The perllocal.pod business was working perfectly before all the recent
changes. I was quite careful to preserve the way it functioned when
I modified the perl modules to include -pm560 etc, back in June.
I'll take a look and see if it can be fixed now.
We've had a number of recent changes to the
Max Horn wrote:
* On Mac OS X 10.3 packages using an old old (1.3.5-based) can now be
compiled twolevel
"old old" ? :-) maybe you meant "old libtool" ?
Erp, yeah. ;)
Is that what you were talking about for the NEWS thing? I couldn't find
an old one in cvs, but I didn't look too hard, figured
forgot reply all again...
Begin forwarded message:
From: TheSin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: November 13, 2003 12:28:48 PM MST
To: "David R. Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] Re: UpdatePOD
NO this would be very very bad, it's been pushed back much too long,
there was a minor p
Hi,
I just noticed that the ncurses 5.3-12 available in 10.2-gcc3.3 does
not support prebinding. A couple packages depending on ncurses are
therefore not prebound, either. I copied the version 5.3-20031018-2
available in the 10.3 tree to the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree and it works
flawlessly (as far as
Hi all,
I just wanted to report a bug, installing the vim-nox binary from a
fresh Fink 0.6.1 installs dlcompat as a dependency, but does not install
dlcompat-shlibs rendering it non-functional. Manually installing
dlcomat-shlibs gets everything going again.
Fred
-
It's so slow when compared to the compiled versions I've found
elsewhere for the Mac.
I have found an increase of about 200% (fink-lame speed of 0.7 versus
altivec-compiled-lame of 2.2/2.3) when lame is compiled as these fellows
have done (on G4's):
http://forums.blacktree.com/viewtopic.ph
Fink::FinkVersion.pm is generated from perlmod/Fink/FinkVersion.pm.in. It
only has two variables. @VERSION@ and @[EMAIL PROTECTED] @VERSION@ I can
understand, it comes from the VERSION file and is set at build time. But
@BASEPATH@ is in fink.conf and can be gotten from Fink::Config.
Is there a
I have a request. The amount of mail on fink-commits generated by .info
and .patch file changes is rather daunting.
Could the fink-commits list be split into seperate lists for seperate
projects? At the very least could the changes to .info and .patch files be
put on a seperate list? Or a lis
I was fairly horrified to see things like this in the fink source.
&execute("/bin/mkdir -p $bsbase");
So I wrote up a little module to emulate the most common shell commands
used. Fink::Command, its in CVS now.
I've also patched up all the modules to use Fink::Command instead of
execute(
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:28:23PM +0100, Max Horn wrote:
> Well, I get this:
>
> [arrakis:~/Projekte/fink-cvs/fink] maxhorn% make test
> ./Base/initialize...ok
> ./Base/paramok
> ./Base/param_booleanok
> ./Config/exportsok
> ./Config/load_save..
My MTA had one of its periodic arguments with SourceForge's MTA.
--
Michael G Schwern[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
"How would you describe TKB? As a disk exerciser? The first manufacturer
supplied computer virus?"
-- Carl Friedberg in
<[EMAIL
On Nov 13, 2003, at 1:38 AM, Gordon Mackenzie wrote:
It's so slow when compared to the compiled versions I've found
elsewhere for the Mac.
I have found an increase of about 200% (fink-lame speed of 0.7 versus
altivec-compiled-lame of 2.2/2.3) when lame is compiled as these
fellows have
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:32:44PM -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> I have a request. The amount of mail on fink-commits generated by .info
> and .patch file changes is rather daunting.
>
> Could the fink-commits list be split into seperate lists for seperate
> projects? At the very least coul
acctually so the debs stay the same, fink needs to have a virtual pkg
for altivec and then have a lame-altivec version which would depend on
altivec and would could then use -faltivec...like i did with ffmpeg,
but with ffmpeg I forced it on, not really great but since there is no
way to det
shouldn't we also make a new bundle release of fileutils with depends
on coreutils to make sure ppl upgrade that aren't reading this :)
On 13-Nov-03, at 7:37 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/utils
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv13164
Added
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 08:21:06PM -0800, David R. Morrison wrote:
> Log Message:
> Revise get_perl_dir_arch() and the places where it is used, correcting some
> errors in UpdatePOD in case of Type: perl, and guaranteeing that the correct
> perl command is used when needed.
Wedging another retur
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 12:18:39AM -0500, Daniel Macks wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:32:44PM -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > I have a request. The amount of mail on fink-commits generated by .info
> > and .patch file changes is rather daunting.
> >
> > Could the fink-commits list be spl
Sorry _ bounced. Retrying ..
JF
Begin forwarded message:
Resent-From: jfm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: jfm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: November 13, 2003 6:12:10 PM CET
Resent-To: David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Justin Hallett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fink devel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TheSin <[E
Uh, isn't that what 8.12 is?
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> Update of /cvsroot/fink/web/xml/faq
> In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv27900/xml/faq
>
> Modified Files:
> faq.xml
> Log Message:
> FAQ on X11 SDK for Panther (finally!)
>
>
> Index: faq.xml
> =
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:23:00PM +0100, Max Horn wrote:
> I think it would be preferable to move any discussions about commits
> mails from fink-commits to fink-devel. They are very easy to miss
> between the dozens of commit mails we get all the time.
>
> As such, I've removed the special pos
34 matches
Mail list logo
