On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 02:31:42PM +0100, jfm wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Since today's update to fink, I also get msgs :
>
> Failed: Can't resolve dependency "libsoup-ssl-shlibs (= 1.99.28-3)" for
> package "libsoup-ssl-1.99.28-3" (no matching packages/versions found)
> Failed: Can't resolve dependenc
Hi Dan,
Trying a bit more :
fink list -o
Information about 3532 packages read in 15 seconds.
Use of uninitialized value in exists at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Status.pm
line 153.
Use of uninitialized value in exists at
/sw/lib/perl5/Fink/VirtPackage.pm line 472.
... repeats
I omit the non-interesting
Hi Dan,
Since today's update to fink, I also get msgs :
Failed: Can't resolve dependency "libsoup-ssl-shlibs (= 1.99.28-3)" for
package "libsoup-ssl-1.99.28-3" (no matching packages/versions found)
Failed: Can't resolve dependency "gal199-shlibs (= 1.99.11-6)" for
package "gal199-1.99.11-6" (no
On 18.03.2004, at 10:06, Yael Maguire wrote:
can't compile - problem with pngread.cc
Thanks for the feedback. However, we will need more information to help
you. Could you send the compile output with the exact error number?
Chris.
thanks and great job overall!
Yael Maguire
--
Package manager v
On Mar 18, 2004, at 10:53 AM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
Alright, in fink cvs, du_sk now counts the same as 'du -sk' on both
filesystems. I had to remove the test for du_sk(empty directory) = 0,
since apparently it's not on UFS.
jfm, could you please test it? Thanks.
Dave
I did try.
It seems OK (
can't compile - problem with pngread.cc
thanks and great job overall!
Yael Maguire
--
Package manager version: 0.19.2
Distribution version: 0.7.0.cvs
Mac OS X version: 10.3.3
December 2001 Developer Tools
gcc version: 3.3
make version: 3.79
Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander
Alright, in fink cvs, du_sk now counts the same as 'du -sk' on both
filesystems. I had to remove the test for du_sk(empty directory) = 0,
since apparently it's not on UFS.
jfm, could you please test it? Thanks.
Dave
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 06:48:52PM -0500, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
> On Mar 17, 2004, at 1:22 PM, jfm wrote:
> >I thought this was quite correct : isn't a subdirectory a file in
> >itself ?
>
> Directories are files, yes. But why doesn't du count directories on
> HFS? I don't care which it does, a
