[Fink-devel] gtk+2

2005-02-19 Thread Michael
just to get glib2-2.6.2, and gtk+2-2.6.2 to work right with gtk-doc I had to copy alot of the 10.3 tree into the 10.2-gcc3.3 (my) tree. Well not alot but opensp4 openjade gmp gdbm3 libxml2 libxslt and gtk-doc. Tony Arnold helped me with pango and I had to edit the fontconfig2-dev package from

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2

2005-02-19 Thread David R. Morrison
Mike, If you will post a list of the precise packages (with version and revision number) which you have "brought over" from 10.3 and tested under 10.2-gcc3.3, I will add them to the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree. The main issue here is that most maintainers are only keeping up with the 10.3 tree now, and prob

[Fink-devel] [OT]: OpenOSX humor

2005-02-19 Thread Koen van der Drift
Just read this on the OpenOSX website: "OpenOSX ReadyStream will have you developing and delivering multimedia with newfound power in record time with world-class ease that OpenOSX is famous for. Just double-click the package icon and within minutes, you'll have an incredible multimedia power

[Fink-devel] policy question

2005-02-19 Thread David R. Morrison
Folks, Here's a policy question. The libjpeg package, like many packages, uses a number of header files during compilation which are considered "internal," and only installs the "external" ones at install time. The external header files end up in the libjpeg package, but the internal ones don't.

Re: [Fink-devel] policy question

2005-02-19 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David R. Morrison wrote: | The policy question is: should the new package download the libjpeg source | and copy the needed headers into its build tree, or should the libjpeg | package install the internal headers "by hand", for the benefit of this | ot

Re: [Fink-devel] [OT]: OpenOSX humor

2005-02-19 Thread Corey Halpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Koen van der Drift wrote: > Just read this on the OpenOSX website: > > "OpenOSX ReadyStream will have you developing and delivering > multimedia with newfound power in record time with world-class ease > that OpenOSX is famous for. Just double-clic

Re: [Fink-devel] wxWidgets vs. wxMac

2005-02-19 Thread Alexander Strange
On Feb 19, 2005, at 2:47 AM, Trevor Harmon wrote: To prevent this from happening, I'm wondering what could be done. Could a virtual package be added, called wxWidgets, that maps to wxMac? Or perhaps there's some mechanism in Fink for specifying package aliases/synonyms? For instance, the Fink da

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2

2005-02-19 Thread David R. Morrison
I've added these to the 10.2-gcc3.3/unstable tree, except for libxml2 and gdbm3, which were already at the versions you requested. -- Dave On Feb 19, 2005, at 1:58 PM, Michael wrote: David R. Morrison wrote: Mike, If you will post a list of the precise packages (with version and revision numbe

Re: [Fink-devel] wxWidgets vs. wxMac

2005-02-19 Thread Trevor Harmon
On Feb 19, 2005, at 9:41 AM, Alexander Strange wrote: "wxWidgets" is just a generic name; implementations of it for other stuff are named wxWindows, wxGTK, wxMac, etc. Right, I understand that now, but people who have never heard of wxWidgets (like me one week ago) won't know that. After all, oth

[Fink-devel] gtk+2

2005-02-19 Thread Michael
I seem to have broken my own package, and am at a loss as to how. The build fails with: /usr/bin/libtool: internal link edit command failed make[4]: *** [libgdk-x11-2.0.la] Error 1 make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2

2005-02-19 Thread David R. Morrison
On Feb 19, 2005, at 5:02 PM, Michael wrote: [snip] Then before that, I get: /.libs/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.dylib /sw/lib/libintl.dylib -install_name /sw/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.0.dylib -compatibility_version 601 -current_version 601.2 ld: warning -dylib_install_name /sw/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.0.dylib not fo

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2

2005-02-19 Thread Martin Costabel
Michael wrote: I seem to have broken my own package, and am at a loss as to how. The build fails with: /usr/bin/libtool: internal link edit command failed This means that there was an error, but the message describing the error comes before this line. make[4]: *** [libgdk-x11-2.0.la] Error 1 m

[Fink-devel] Pybliographer

2005-02-19 Thread Don McKenzie Paul
./configure --prefix=/sw checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether ln -s works... yes checking for python... /sw/bin/python checking python requi

Re: [Fink-devel] Pybliographer

2005-02-19 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Don McKenzie Paul wrote: ./configure --prefix=/sw checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether ln -s works... yes checking for python... /sw/bin/pyt