-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
When you develop away and you alter an info file, check it into CVs and
then do something like:
fink list --maintainer=Darian
Fink has detected that your package index cache is missing or out of
date, but does not have privileges to modify it.
Re-r
Trevor Harmon wrote:
On Mar 30, 2005, at 10:19 AM, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
But once you filter out the idea (also not copyrightable, see Title
17, Sec. 102(b)), I suspect you'll find that the expression of that
idea is quite limited by the technical and policy requirements of the
info file.
T
On Mar 30, 2005, at 10:19 AM, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
But once you filter out the idea (also not copyrightable, see Title
17, Sec. 102(b)), I suspect you'll find that the expression of that
idea is quite limited by the technical and policy requirements of the
info file.
True, but that is not t
How does Debian handle this? They use a similar info/patch system,
right? And I've seen from other issues that debian-legal is very
involved in licensing issues so I'm guessing they've thought this out.
Hanspeter
--
Hanspeter Niederstrasser, Ph.D.Dept. of Cell Biology
hniederstrass
On Mar 30, 2005, at 6:48 AM, Daniel E. Macks wrote:
David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
In that spirit, it makes sense to me that we would say that the
patch files inherited the same license their project was released
under.
By "their project", do you mean Fink or each's package?
I am thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Daniel E. Macks wrote:
| David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
|
|>Here's my take on this licensing issue, for what it's worth.
|>
|>I think we should explicitly indicate that authors of .info files are
|>*contributing* those files to the fin
David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Here's my take on this licensing issue, for what it's worth.
>
> I think we should explicitly indicate that authors of .info files are
> *contributing* those files to the fink project when they submit them for
> inclusion in the fink trees. As contrib
RLD wrote:
Problem getting binary for esound via apt-get upgrade:
Failed to fetch
file:/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc//sound/
esound_0.2.35-8_darwin-powerpc.deb Size mismatch
This usually indicates that you forgot to run apt-get update first.
--
Martin
-
