Re: [Fink-devel] missing patch file does not give an error

2005-05-17 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
On May 17, 2005, at 11:20 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote: Thanks for the reply, I wasn't aware of the previous discussion. I will forward your suggestions to the maintainer - Koen. On May 17, 2005, at 11:16 PM, Rohan Lloyd wrote: On 18 May 2005, at 9:59 AM, Koen van der Drift wrote: Hi, I just f

Re: [Fink-devel] missing patch file does not give an error

2005-05-17 Thread Koen van der Drift
Thanks for the reply, I wasn't aware of the previous discussion. I will forward your suggestions to the maintainer - Koen. On May 17, 2005, at 11:16 PM, Rohan Lloyd wrote: On 18 May 2005, at 9:59 AM, Koen van der Drift wrote: Hi, I just found that when a .patch file is missing, fink does not sto

Re: [Fink-devel] (no subject)

2005-05-17 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Alex Clark wrote: Hi All, I'd like to become the package manager for the following package: http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/afni How do I get started ? Thanks! Basically you "just do it". You'll need a sourceforge account if you don't have one already so that you can submit a

[Fink-devel] (no subject)

2005-05-17 Thread Alex Clark
Hi All, I'd like to become the package manager for the following package: http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/afni How do I get started ? Thanks! -- Alex Clark, ContractorSSCC/DIRP/NIMH/NIH Building 10, Room 1D8010 Center Drive, MSC1148 Bet

[Fink-devel] missing patch file does not give an error

2005-05-17 Thread Koen van der Drift
Hi, I just found that when a .patch file is missing, fink does not stop the build of the package. I happen to notice this by accident when building pymol-py24: ... sed 's|@FINKPREFIX@|/sw|g' sh: line 1: /sw/fink/dists/local/main/finkinfo/sci/pymol-py.patch: No such file or directory (cd setup

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [gnome-core] Gimp2 compiling on 10.4-transitional unstable

2005-05-17 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 17 mai 2005 à 20:16, Daniel Macks a écrit : On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:37:29AM +0200, Mich?le Garoche wrote: I thought about hacking the AC_PROG_INTLTOOL macro with something like `which perl` result, would it work? I wrote: OTOH, the AC_PROG_INTLTOOL macro really uses "first 'perl' in PATH". So

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [gnome-core] Gimp2 compiling on 10.4-transitional unstable

2005-05-17 Thread Daniel Macks
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:37:29AM +0200, Mich?le Garoche wrote: > > I thought about hacking the AC_PROG_INTLTOOL macro with something > like `which perl` result, would it work? I wrote: > >OTOH, the AC_PROG_INTLTOOL macro really uses "first 'perl' in > >PATH". So it already *is* doing what y

[Fink-devel] Re: help testing new Installers

2005-05-17 Thread Robert T Wyatt
I can confirm that it is fixed after selfupdate. I've included the complete log below for reference; what it contains includes first the buggy messages and then the good messages. Daniel Macks wrote: On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 07:35:50AM -0500, Robert T Wyatt wrote: ProductVersion: 10.3.9 [...] Rea

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [gnome-core] Gimp2 compiling on 10.4-transitional unstable

2005-05-17 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 17 mai 2005 à 09:42, Daniel Macks a écrit : Taking this to -devel because it's a symtom of a general problem. Consider *not* replying to -gnome-core... On fink-gnome-core, Mich?le Garoche wrote: Compiling gimp2 after using buildfink makes it failed because of an apparently missing dependency on

[Fink-devel] Re: [gnome-core] Gimp2 compiling on 10.4-transitional unstable

2005-05-17 Thread Daniel Macks
Taking this to -devel because it's a symtom of a general problem. Consider *not* replying to -gnome-core... On fink-gnome-core, Mich?le Garoche wrote: > Compiling gimp2 after using buildfink makes it failed because of an > apparently missing dependency on xml-parser-pm586: > > checking for perl