On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 08:19:41PM -0400, David R. Morrison wrote:
> The test versions of the installer have been revised, and I'd appreciate
> testing reports.
>
> http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/Fink-0.7.2-Installer.dmg
> http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/Fink-0.8.0-Installer.dmg
Works fine for me. 0
On 6/2/05, Robert M. Lefkowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If this is in fact the current state of Fink, I would be willing to
> make an attempt to enhance fink to allow multiple source
> repositories.
Have you investigated the "Trees" line in fink.conf? ('man fink.conf'
for details)
I could be
Robert M. Lefkowitz wrote:
> If this is in fact the current state of Fink, I would be willing to
> make an attempt to enhance fink to allow multiple source repositories.
> Is this something that would be viewed as helpful? Would anybody be
> interested in working with me on this?
Even better
Le 3 juin 2005 à 02:19, David R. Morrison a écrit :
The test versions of the installer have been revised, and I'd
appreciate
testing reports.
http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/Fink-0.7.2-Installer.dmg
http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/Fink-0.8.0-Installer.dmg
Could you elaborate what do you mean by
I also set up a local binary distribution following these
instructions -- but after some investigation, it seems that there is
no way to have multiple source repositories. That is, apt supports
the notion of multiple repositories -- which are all searched by
apt.Fink, however, only pe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jun 2, 2005, at 6:54 PM, Jan Paul Schmidt wrote:
Hi there,
is it possible to create a fink package from an existing source
tree? I'm thinking of something like what is possible under Debian:
fakeroot debian/rules binary
no
- -chris
The test versions of the installer have been revised, and I'd appreciate
testing reports.
http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/Fink-0.7.2-Installer.dmg
http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/Fink-0.8.0-Installer.dmg
Thanks,
Dave
---
This SF.Net email is s
Hi there,
is it possible to create a fink package from an existing source tree?
I'm thinking of something like what is possible under Debian:
fakeroot debian/rules binary
I wrote several info files for locally installed packages but did not
find something to let the info file use a s
Hi Jean-François,
Le 2 juin 2005 à 23:28, Jean-François Mertens a écrit :
You may want to try the new upstream version. They'll be in
experimental/michga as soon as it synchronizes, meanwhile they are
here. It works for me with 10.4.1 (that is it compiles and it works
on a real example), tetex
From: Michèle Garoche easyconnect.fr>
Subject: Re: doxygen failure
Newsgroups: gmane.os.apple.fink.general
Date: 2005-05-31 07:14:02 GMT (2 days, 14 hours and 7 minutes ago)
Le 8 mai 2005 à 18:41, Matthew Sachs a écrit :
You may want to try the new upstream version. They'll be in
experimental/
greytomorrow wrote:
[]
ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol __nl_explode_name
/usr/local/lib/libintl.a(explodename.o) definition of __nl_explode_name
[]
ld: Undefined symbols:
_iconv
This looks like a case of FAQ#6.9
http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/faq.en.html#comp-general.usr-local-l
11 matches
Mail list logo
