Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.4-transitional/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci scipy-py.info,1.4,1.5

2005-11-16 Thread Sébastien Maret
On Nov 16, 2005, at 23:22, Jeff Whitaker wrote: Uh - sorry. In a fit of zealotry I forgot that I had passed that package on to you. Feel free to modify, update or delete that update. I would like to maintain the new scipy-core-py package though. That's OK. It probably makes more sense

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.4-transitional/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci scipy-py.info,1.4,1.5

2005-11-16 Thread Jeff Whitaker
Sebastien Maret wrote: Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.4-transitional/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv3504 Modified Files: scipy-py.info Log Message: New upstream version. Index: scipy-py.info =

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.4-transitional/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci scipy-py.info,1.4,1.5

2005-11-16 Thread Sebastien Maret
Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.4-transitional/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci > In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv3504 > > Modified Files: > scipy-py.info > Log Message: > New upstream version. > > > Index: scipy-py.info > ===

Re: [Fink-devel] nessus-1.2.6-1 version number question

2005-11-16 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 11/15/05, Ron and Sharon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Regarding the package "nessus", the Fink Version seems to be 1.2.6-1 > Yet on the Nessus site "www.nessus.org", the current version is > listed as 2.2.6 How does the Fink based app version number relate to > the mother WebSite app version nu

[Fink-devel] nessus-1.2.6-1 version number question

2005-11-16 Thread Ron and Sharon
Regarding the package "nessus", the Fink Version seems to be 1.2.6-1 Yet on the Nessus site "www.nessus.org", the current version is listed as 2.2.6 How does the Fink based app version number relate to the mother WebSite app version number? Did I not update something? I am more familiar

Re: [Fink-devel] proper fix for g77 package?

2005-11-16 Thread Martin Costabel
Jeff Whitaker wrote: [] OK, but it seems like all the symbols are resolved fine even if you don't use the the /usr/lib/gcc/.../libgcc.a. I wonder if it only shows up if you try to link a C lib with g77? This is possible, I don't remember the whole story either. Some of the packages that brok

Re: [Fink-devel] proper fix for g77 package?

2005-11-16 Thread Jeff Whitaker
Jeff Whitaker wrote: Martin Costabel wrote: Jeff Whitaker wrote: [] Peter: I can't remember why JFM added the link to /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8/4.0.0/libgcc.a to g77 in the first place, but if I remove it and rebuild g77, it seems to work fine (on 10.4.2 with Xcode 2.1). The

Re: [Fink-devel] proper fix for g77 package?

2005-11-16 Thread Matthew Sachs
On Nov 16, 2005, at 17:56, Martin Costabel wrote: Jeff Whitaker wrote: [] Peter: I can't remember why JFM added the link to /usr/lib/gcc/ powerpc-apple-darwin8/4.0.0/libgcc.a to g77 in the first place, but if I remove it and rebuild g77, it seems to work fine (on 10.4.2 with Xcode 2.1).

Re: [Fink-devel] proper fix for g77 package?

2005-11-16 Thread Jeff Whitaker
Martin Costabel wrote: Jeff Whitaker wrote: [] Peter: I can't remember why JFM added the link to /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8/4.0.0/libgcc.a to g77 in the first place, but if I remove it and rebuild g77, it seems to work fine (on 10.4.2 with Xcode 2.1). The reason was the old rest

Re: [Fink-devel] proper fix for g77 package?

2005-11-16 Thread Martin Costabel
Jeff Whitaker wrote: [] Peter: I can't remember why JFM added the link to /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8/4.0.0/libgcc.a to g77 in the first place, but if I remove it and rebuild g77, it seems to work fine (on 10.4.2 with Xcode 2.1). The reason was the old rest_FP/save_FP undefined symbo

Re: [Fink-devel] proper fix for g77 package?

2005-11-16 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Jeff Whitaker wrote: I think we want the g77 binary package to work for both users with xcode-2.1 and xcode-2.2, which precludes building differently behaving pacakges depending on the user's currently installed gcc. What is there at the moment sucks and won't work on intel (i386 != i686), unfo

Re: [Fink-devel] Build failure for jpilot-ssl-0.99.7-11

2005-11-16 Thread Martin Costabel
Alexander K. Hansen wrote: [] | #include | int | main () | { | | int main() | { It is rather surprising that earlier gcc versions accepted such ridiculous code. I think this nested main() comes from a broken configure.in file. The authors didn't bother to look up how to use the AC_TRY_COMPI

Re: [Fink-devel] proper fix for g77 package?

2005-11-16 Thread Jeff Whitaker
Peter O'Gorman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jack Howarth wrote: | Since a new gromacs, version 3.3 has been released, I will be | updating the fink gromacs package soon. However, we will need to | address the breakage in g77 from Xcode 2.2 for the required | lammpi

[Fink-devel] Re: problem is with /sw/bin/lamd in lammpi

2005-11-16 Thread William Scott
Hi Jack et al: Ok, the fink lammpi_7.0.6-11 package in a clean /sw works. If I try to install lammpi 7.1.1 with fink (same package, just changed the version number and md5sum), it does not. If I install lammpi 7.1.1 with DarwinPorts, it works, BUT it lacks the fortran bindings. I think I

Re: [Fink-devel] proper fix for g77 package?

2005-11-16 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jack Howarth wrote: | Since a new gromacs, version 3.3 has been released, I will be | updating the fink gromacs package soon. However, we will need to | address the breakage in g77 from Xcode 2.2 for the required | lammpi support to work. The las

[Fink-devel] proper fix for g77 package?

2005-11-16 Thread Jack Howarth
Since a new gromacs, version 3.3 has been released, I will be updating the fink gromacs package soon. However, we will need to address the breakage in g77 from Xcode 2.2 for the required lammpi support to work. The last time I asked any of the Darwin programmers about the buried path to acces

[Fink-devel] Build failure for jpilot-ssl-0.99.7-11

2005-11-16 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
OS 10.4.3, XCode 2.2, X.org (/usr/local safely out of the way) - $ fink list pilot-link Information about 5205 packages read in 6 seconds. i pilot-link90.11.8-35Palm libraries i pilot-link9-bin0.11.8-35Palm libraries pilot-link9-per