On 1/4/06, Alexander K. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/4/06, William Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It hangs (G4, Xcode 2.1, everything up to date, I'm doing this
> > remotely):
> >
> > + java org.apache.stylebook.StyleBook targetDirectory=docs
> > book.xml ../styles/apachexml
> > [
On 1/4/06, William Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It hangs (G4, Xcode 2.1, everything up to date, I'm doing this
> remotely):
>
> + java org.apache.stylebook.StyleBook targetDirectory=docs
> book.xml ../styles/apachexml
> [StyleBook] Overriding targetDirectory="docs" (Old=".")
> [StyleBook] Pro
quite minor. I just noticed that a couple - well 5 actually: giftd,
opennms, pfamserver, sleepnow and wwwblast - are wrongly marked as
unmaintained in Fink Commander.
I checked the info files and I can see no reason for that... surely enough
'fink describe' yields expected results so it seems to b
On 1/3/06, Rogue Marechal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For a start I am getting a fuzz warning of 1. I read and reread the man
> page and I more or less understand what that means but still I can't find
> the offending spot. I guess finding it would help clear out a lot of
> things.
[Note: I just
It hangs (G4, Xcode 2.1, everything up to date, I'm doing this
remotely):
+ java org.apache.stylebook.StyleBook targetDirectory=docs
book.xml ../styles/apachexml
[StyleBook] Overriding targetDirectory="docs" (Old=".")
[StyleBook] Project URL: "sbk:/sources/book.xml"
[BasicEngine] Initializin
On 04 Jan 2006, at 18:22, Daniel E. Macks wrote:
Trevor Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
On Jan 4, 2006, at 2:22 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
If you specify an explicit interpretter in a PatchScript,
CompileScript, or InstallScript (i.e, the first line of the field
begins with #!), please always
On Jan 4, 2006, at 9:30 AM, Christian Schaffner wrote:
hi Charlie
On 03.01.2006, at 17:28, Charles Curry wrote:
I assume there is nothing wrong with compiling neon24 with gcc 4.0.1,
but the current package being distributed through Fink mirrors
seems to
prevent this. Might you be able to s
hi Charlie
On 03.01.2006, at 17:28, Charles Curry wrote:
I assume there is nothing wrong with compiling neon24 with gcc 4.0.1,
but the current package being distributed through Fink mirrors seems to
prevent this. Might you be able to send me a quick fix, either
user-edited or patched, to allow
Trevor Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Jan 4, 2006, at 2:22 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
>>
>> If you specify an explicit interpretter in a PatchScript,
>> CompileScript, or InstallScript (i.e, the first line of the field
>> begins with #!), please always pass the "-e" flag to that shell.
>
> How
On Jan 4, 2006, at 2:22 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
If you specify an explicit interpretter in a PatchScript,
CompileScript, or InstallScript (i.e, the first line of the field
begins with #!), please always pass the "-e" flag to that shell.
How about making this the default behavior? When processi
If you specify an explicit interpretter in a PatchScript,
CompileScript, or InstallScript (i.e, the first line of the field
begins with #!), please always pass the "-e" flag to that shell.
Without this flag, an error during one of the shell commands in the
field does not cause the package building
11 matches
Mail list logo
