Re: [Fink-devel] openldap-ssl-2.1.22-26

2006-03-01 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 3/1/06, Keita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, the openldap-ssl-2.1.22-26 (from source) or 2.1.22-25(from binary) is > not working: > > For what OS version? That's a useful little bit of information when you're filing a bug report. > > > > when installing binary, apt-get returns: > >

Re: [Fink-devel] mozilla-browser-1.7.5-2

2006-03-01 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 3/1/06, Harley Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good sirs, > I'm having difficulty running mozilla. I'm running under the newer > Tiger OS X, latest version. Mozilla ran fine on the previous > installation of X11, and now fails to initialize giving the following > warning: > > $ mozilla > Er

[Fink-devel] mozilla-browser-1.7.5-2

2006-03-01 Thread Harley Jones
Good sirs, I'm having difficulty running mozilla. I'm running under the newer Tiger OS X, latest version. Mozilla ran fine on the previous installation of X11, and now fails to initialize giving the following warning: $ mozilla Error: No running window found. /sw/bin/mozilla: line 62: 6

[Fink-devel] openldap-ssl-2.1.22-26

2006-03-01 Thread Keita
Hello, the openldap-ssl-2.1.22-26 (from source) or 2.1.22-25(from binary) is not working:when installing binary, apt-get returns:  openldap-ssl: Depends: openldap-ssl-shlibs (= 2.1.22-25) but 2.1.22-26 is to be installedwhen installing source, fink returns:The following package will be installed or

Re: [Fink-devel] Q: how to get a "current" version of fink (the manager)?

2006-03-01 Thread Dave Vasilevsky
On Mar 1, 2006, at 12:57 PM, Adrian Mugnolo wrote: Earlier today I came accross a problem with the "fink validate" command (a call to an undefined Perl subroutine). When I checked against CVS, fink (the manager) files on my system were not "current". Adrian, Fink (the package manager) has a

Re: [Fink-devel] Q: how to get a "current" version of fink (the manager)?

2006-03-01 Thread Adrian Mugnolo
> How about actually pasting the error up instead of > leaving us in the > dark as to what it is? Thanks for your reply, Alexander. Just switched back to "selfupdate-rsync" mechanism. Here goes the error: [EMAIL PROTECTED] fink -V ; fink validate tidy.info Package manager version: 0.24.12 Dist

Re: [Fink-devel] Q: how to get a "current" version of fink (the manager)?

2006-03-01 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 3/1/06, Adrian Mugnolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Earlier today I came accross a problem with the "fink > validate" command (a call to an undefined Perl > subroutine). How about actually pasting the error up instead of leaving us in the dark as to what it is? When I checked against CVS, fink

[Fink-devel] Q: how to get a "current" version of fink (the manager)?

2006-03-01 Thread Adrian Mugnolo
Earlier today I came accross a problem with the "fink validate" command (a call to an undefined Perl subroutine). When I checked against CVS, fink (the manager) files on my system were not "current". According to the man page, "fink selfupdate-cvs" updates fink (the tool) and Fink (the package tr

[Fink-devel] Re: Re: ppc unix binaries on Macintel?

2006-03-01 Thread Jack Howarth
Peter, Actually I'm not all that concerned about the g77 situation. The gfortran in gcc 4.1 is much improved and should handle almost all g77 compatible code. I've been using it to compile xplor-nih and it works as well as g77. Jack

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: ppc unix binaries on Macintel?

2006-03-01 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David R. Morrison wrote: | | On Feb 28, 2006, at 4:15 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: | |> Chris, |> I had been hoping that X11.app and Rosetta would have been |> designed such that the X11 libs would be present in both binary |> formats (intel and ppc) s