Am 21.03.2006 um 04:08 schrieb Koen van der Drift:
Sometimes one of the core maintainers is doing a batch update of
many packages. Would it be required in such a situation to contact
the maintainers first? That could take many weeks in the worst
case. And mostly it is a change that is not
On Mar 21, 2006, at 03:00, Max Horn wrote:
Those batch updates usually involved adding a new field, or
replacing a dependency with a new one. I don't think that the
maintainers need to be notified asked about this one-by-one.
However, a notification mail explaining the change in a generic
Is anyone else seeing the following warnings on a cvs fink-selfupdate
of 10.4 today?
cvs update: -m wrapper option is not supported remotely; ignored
I haven't seen this one before.
Jack
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by
On Mar 20, 2006, at 11:57 PM, Max Horn wrote:
Well, in my eyes, those rights were already severely cut when
those packages where moved to the intel tree, without the
maintainers being involved in anyway. Again, I understand the
logistic reasons for this. But: by this process, the packages
I'm running OS X 10.4.5 on a G4, with the latest unstable fink,
updated daily. sane-backends-1.0.15-4 will not build, failing like:
mkdir .libs
gcc -o .libs/scanimage scanimage.o stiff.o -Wl,-framework -
Wl,CoreFoundation -Wl,-framework -Wl,IOKit ../lib/liblib.a ../
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 08:04:25PM -0600, Chris Dolan wrote:
You could easily parse the password out of your PHP file like so:
There are many ways we *could* do it if we were setting it up de novo.
But we already *are* doing it a certain way and that way is ingrained
in several places. That's
Is anyone else seeing the following warnings on a cvs fink-selfupdate
of 10.4 today?
cvs update: -m wrapper option is not supported remotely; ignored
Yes, just last night.
I haven't seen this one before.
Jack
Me neither.
On Mar 21, 2006, at 8:48 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Is anyone else seeing the following warnings on a cvs fink-
selfupdate
of 10.4 today?
cvs update: -m wrapper option is not supported remotely; ignored
I haven't seen this one before.
Jack
Yes, I'm seeing that message in
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 09:48:17AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
Is anyone else seeing the following warnings on a cvs fink-selfupdate
of 10.4 today?
cvs update: -m wrapper option is not supported remotely; ignored
I haven't seen this one before.
web-pdb update script starting seeing it
Am 21.03.2006 um 15:59 schrieb David R. Morrison:
On Mar 20, 2006, at 11:57 PM, Max Horn wrote:
Well, in my eyes, those rights were already severely cut when
those packages where moved to the intel tree, without the
maintainers being involved in anyway. Again, I understand the
logistic
Hi,
Some days ago, I submitted an initial port for the
latest version of Digium's Asterisk PBX (IDs: 1447912
and 1448019). Have been running it since then with no
problems:
pb-g4*CLI show version
Asterisk 1.2.5 built by root @ pb-g4.local on a Power
Macintosh running Darwin on 2006-03-13
The new sane-backends-1.0.17-1 package built OK.
Thanks for the quick fix,
Kevin Horton
On 21 Mar 2006, at 06:09, Kevin Horton wrote:
I'm running OS X 10.4.5 on a G4, with the latest unstable fink,
updated daily. sane-backends-1.0.15-4 will not build, failing like:
mkdir .libs
gcc -o
Max,
I've just expanded the message which fink gives to users upon a
compile failure. If the user is on intel hardware, after the
suggestion to email the maintainer appears the sentence: Note that
many fink package maintainers do not (yet) have access to OSX on
Intel hardware, so you
Hey Fink Devel.
I get today always that error after fink update-all
i did 2 times a new fink selfupdate allready
perhaps you know how can i debug this :
gcc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../include -I../include -I/usr/local/
include -no-cpp-precomp -DOSX_ONLY_10_2_API=1
New buildfink data are up.
http://fink.opendarwin.org/build/2006-03-09/ppc/out/report.html
http://fink.opendarwin.org/build/2006-03-09/i386/out/report.html
There are some new categories which should make some types of failure
modes, especially missing libraries and Intel-specific issues,
Hi,
I originally tried to send this message to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
but it was returned. It looks like the return was a transient issue
(interrupted system call), but apparently the error was permanent
enough to return the mail.
Anyway, the original issue was:
Hi,
The DNS records for
16 matches
Mail list logo
