[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/graphics qt3mac.info,1.5,1.6

2006-04-26 Thread Benjamin Reed
On 4/26/06, Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: New upstream version 3.3.6. Appbundle links in PostInstScript Any particular reason this isn't done with AppBundles: ? If there's a problem with the AppBundles code, I'd rather fix it in fink instead of reimplementing it in individual

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/graphics qt3mac.info,1.5,1.6

2006-04-26 Thread Martin Costabel
Benjamin Reed wrote: On 4/26/06, Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: New upstream version 3.3.6. Appbundle links in PostInstScript Any particular reason this isn't done with AppBundles: ? I have never got this to work. It is still not clear to me where the AppBundles field expects to

[Fink-devel] non-PIC in shared lib detect in fink validate

2006-04-26 Thread Jack Howarth
I discovered that the gmp developers have been incorrectly building non-PIC code into their shared libraries. They have been using -fast which sets -mdynamic-no-pic without adding an explicit -fPIC. I recall some discussion on the debian mailing lists of checking for non-PIC code in linux