I am working on a package for Gnucash 1.9.x (beta versions
for Gnucash 2.0 that should be released soon). The package is my in
exp branch.
It compiles fine, but there is a problem with shared libs:
% gnucash
ERROR: In procedure dynamic-link:
ERROR: file: "libgw-core-utils", message: "dlopen(libgw
Martin,
Have you tried the current gcc 4.1 branch from snapshot or svn?
I would avoid gcc 4.2 for now since it is so far from release. However
there are a huge number of fixes in the 4.1 branch for gfortran since
the 4.1.0 release. They might have backported the MacIntel changes
into that branc
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 12:47 +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> []
> > The g95 situation means that, due to the nature of the GPL, anything
> > built with g95 becomes GPL licensed.
>
> Do you have an official word from the g95 authors on this or is this
> just speculation? No
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 12:47 +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> []
> > The g95 situation means that, due to the nature of the GPL, anything
> > built with g95 becomes GPL licensed.
>
> Do you have an official word from the g95 authors on this or is this
> just speculation? No
On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 08:31 +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> What the long term prospects of g95 and gfortran are, nobody knows. But
> right now, g95 just works better than gfortran.
There are issues with g95 that may affect the binary distribution. The
runtime libraries are licensed under the GPL
Martin,
You should be able to run the testsuite on your exp build of gcc
if you have the dejagnu package installed from fink and just...
cd gcc4-4.1.0-20060506/darwin_objdir/gcc
make check-fortran
Have you tried the current gcc 4.1 branch to see if it works on Intel?
I normally just do the fo
On May 8, 2006, at 5:55 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
Actually, 'man gcc' on a system with xcode 2.2.1 (ie, on my intel mac)
says it, so that particular verbiage is in the wild, as it were.
Same on my G5 iMac.
- Koen.
---
Using Tomcat but need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kyle Moffett wrote:
> On May 7, 2006, at 06:22:01, Cian Hughes wrote:
>> A friend just pointed this out to me, and I thought it might be of
>> interest to people here :)
>>
>> "can only be used on Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) and later systems"
>
> Doesn't
On May 7, 2006, at 06:22:01, Cian Hughes wrote:
A friend just pointed this out to me, and I thought it might be of
interest to people here :)
"can only be used on Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) and later systems"
Doesn't that fall really squarely under "NDA-only information"? What
contracts are
On 5/8/06, Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not sure this is the right list (hope so). I've just done this
selfupdate then update all twice, and I get the same results: the
koffice build (I didn';t ask for koffice, apparently the kde-bundle
bring it in) dies in building the kross libra
I'm not sure this is the right list (hope so). I've just done this
selfupdate then update all twice, and I get the same results: the
koffice build (I didn';t ask for koffice, apparently the kde-bundle
bring it in) dies in building the kross library:
Error creating ./lib/kross/python/CXX/cxx_ex
A friend just pointed this out to me, and I thought it might be of
interest to people here :)
% man gcc | grep -B 1 -A 3 garbage | head -5
-fobjc-gc
Enable garbage collection (GC) for Objective-C objects. The
resulting binary can only be used on Mac OS X 10.5
(Le
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
[]
The g95 situation means that, due to the nature of the GPL, anything
built with g95 becomes GPL licensed.
Do you have an official word from the g95 authors on this or is this
just speculation? Normally, the output of a GPL compiler does not
automatically have to be G
13 matches
Mail list logo
