On Jul 28, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Lars Rosengreen wrote:
> Please excuse me for continuing a discussion that is several months
> old, but I am still not sure about a few things.
>
> On 1/11/06, David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 10, 2006, at 10:05 PM, Lars Rosengreen wrote:
>>
>
> The Package field is sbcl for both packages. You need an
> Architecture field for each one, and the names of the files should be
> sbcl-powerpc.info and sbcl-i386.info.
>
ok, thanks!
> > On a sort of related note, another common lisp implementation I
> > maintain now has a 64bit G5 specific v
On Jul 29, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Lars Rosengreen wrote:
>
>> > On a sort of related note, another common lisp implementation I
>> > maintain now has a 64bit G5 specific version in addition to the
>> > original generic powerpc version. What can I do to ensure that
>> only
>> > someone with a G5 ins
