On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:18:13AM -0400, David Reiser wrote:
I'm trying to stomp on a remaining issue in bmaret's experimental
gnucash.info. fink install gnucash completes (as long as gwenhywfar
is installed - gotta fix that dependency, too) and gnucash works. But
fink remove gnucash
On Oct 6, 2006, at 1:27 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:18:13AM -0400, David Reiser wrote:
I'm trying to stomp on a remaining issue in bmaret's experimental
gnucash.info. fink install gnucash completes (as long as gwenhywfar
is installed - gotta fix that dependency, too)
On 10/6/06, David Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so fink is merrily making install in /sw/src/fink.build/root-
gnucash-2.0.1-1
then suddenly it switches to making install in /sw/lib/gnucash
and then it switches back to making install in /sw/src/fink.build/
root-gnucash-2.0.1-1
I invite
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 09:27:19AM -0400, Charles Lepple wrote:
On 10/6/06, David Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so fink is merrily making install in /sw/src/fink.build/root-
gnucash-2.0.1-1
then suddenly it switches to making install in /sw/lib/gnucash
and then it switches back to
On 10/6/06, Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 09:27:19AM -0400, Charles Lepple wrote:
I invite someone with better knowledge of this switch to correct me,
but this is where I would use --build-as-nobody. That way, you
should get errors when the install process
On Fri, October 6, 2006 11:20 am, Charles Lepple wrote:
On 10/6/06, Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 09:27:19AM -0400, Charles Lepple wrote:
I invite someone with better knowledge of this switch to correct me,
but this is where I would use
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 11:20:07AM -0400, Charles Lepple wrote:
On 10/6/06, Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 09:27:19AM -0400, Charles Lepple wrote:
I invite someone with better knowledge of this switch to correct me,
but this is where I would use
This list is the maintainer contact for the Fink package of VICE, so I
thought I'd post a message saying that I have submitted an updated
package. On a related note, Rob Braun did not respond to a FinkCommander
feedback e-mail regarding updating the cc65 package, so I went ahead and
submitted a
On Oct 7, 2006, at 4:57 AM, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
This list is the maintainer contact for the Fink package of VICE, so I
thought I'd post a message saying that I have submitted an updated
package. On a related note, Rob Braun did not respond to a
FinkCommander
feedback e-mail
On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 08:48:30 +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On Oct 7, 2006, at 4:57 AM, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
This list is the maintainer contact for the Fink package of VICE, so I
thought I'd post a message saying that I have submitted an updated
package. On a related note, Rob Braun
10 matches
Mail list logo
