Re: [Fink-devel] fink vs. the alternatives

Bill, I think you've raised a valid concern. The big problem, as I see it, is that the fink project doesn't have the manpower to put fink into the kind of better shape which would make users happier about it. And, not to put too fine a point on it, the fact that not only users, but also de

Re: [Fink-devel] Compiling popt: Out of memory error.

James Robinson wrote: > On 2006-11-06 20:12:37 +, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: [] >> According to James Robinson on the bug tracker item #1572715, the >> reason for this problem seems to be a bad interpretation of the >> >> Source: mirror:master:%n-%v.tar.gz >> >> field in the pop

Re: [Fink-devel] freetype219-shlibs-2.1.9-3

Peter Dyballa wrote: > Hello! > > To create xdvipdfmx from the XeTeX distribution > (http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&item_id=XeTeX&;) > we need a libfreetype2 with these two functions: > > _FT_GetFile_From_Mac_ATS_Name > _FT_New_Face_From_FSSpec > > Can you cor

[Fink-devel] fink vs. the alternatives

Hi folks: Periodically, I see posted on other mailing lists or bulletin boards a question like "should I use fink or Darwinports or ..."? I'm not sure what it says about my state of mind, but I always read these and come away somewhat disappointed, because fink often seems to take a beat

[Fink-devel] freetype219-shlibs-2.1.9-3

Hello! To create xdvipdfmx from the XeTeX distribution (http:// scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&item_id=XeTeX&) we need a libfreetype2 with these two functions: _FT_GetFile_From_Mac_ATS_Name _FT_New_Face_From_FSSpec Can you correct the making of libfreetype

Re: [Fink-devel] No longer maintaining fink packages assigned to me

Daniel Henninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I just realized I never sent out an official announcement about this, but I am > not maintaining any of the fink packages assigned to me anymore. I do not > have > any of the fink tree set up on my machine at the moment, otherwise I would go > ahead an

Re: [Fink-devel] Xcode 2.4.1 Build Report

Le 8 nov. 2006 à 19:32, Matthew Sachs a écrit :I did a world build on Intel and PPC with Xcode 2.4.1.  Results look  quite good; there don't appear to be any issues with the new Xcode  version.

[Fink-devel] Xcode 2.4.1 Build Report

I did a world build on Intel and PPC with Xcode 2.4.1. Results look quite good; there don't appear to be any issues with the new Xcode version.

Re: [Fink-devel] g95 issue with Apple as from XCode 2.4

Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sebastien Maret wrote: >> Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >>> Sebastien Maret wrote: >>> Hello, I am getting the following error (warning?) for every Fortran program I compile with Fink g95 (0.90-1) on 10.4.7 x

Re: [Fink-devel] Compiling popt: Out of memory error.

On 11/7/06, James Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2006-11-06 20:12:37 +, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > Alexander Hansen wrote: > >> On 11/4/06, Jim Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Alexander Hansen wrote: > We've had a number of reports of problems compiling

Re: [Fink-devel] g95 issue with Apple as from XCode 2.4

Sebastien Maret wrote: > Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Sebastien Maret wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am getting the following error (warning?) for every Fortran program >>> I compile with Fink g95 (0.90-1) on 10.4.7 x86: >>> >>> % cat test.f >>> program hello >>>

Re: [Fink-devel] Compiling popt: Out of memory error.

On 2006-11-06 20:12:37 +, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Alexander Hansen wrote: >> On 11/4/06, Jim Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Alexander Hansen wrote: We've had a number of reports of problems compiling popt in unstable. > [] >> The version in the stable tree has bee