Am 09.11.2006 um 07:01 schrieb Martin Costabel:
Peter Dyballa wrote:
Hello!
To create xdvipdfmx from the XeTeX distribution (http://
scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsiitem_id=XeTeX)
we need a libfreetype2 with these two functions:
_FT_GetFile_From_Mac_ATS_Name
Hi folks:
Hello Bill.
Periodically, I see posted on other mailing lists or bulletin boards
a question like should I use fink or Darwinports or ...? I'm not
sure what it says about my state of mind, but I always read these and
come away somewhat disappointed, because fink often seems to
Peter Dyballa wrote:
Am 09.11.2006 um 07:01 schrieb Martin Costabel:
[]
For several months, I have been using Ben Reed's experimental
version of freetype 2.2.1 that has these features. I think he could
submit it to unstable, although perhaps not all problems with
backward compatibility
Peter Dyballa wrote:
Am 09.11.2006 um 21:05 schrieb Martin Costabel:
It is from RangerRick's experimental tree, to be found buried in the
svn repository on finkproject.org. You can get it from websvn at this
address (plus the corresponging *.patch:
Martin Costabel wrote:
I hope so. RR is kept in CC of this thread, in case he wants to submit
this version to the unstable repository. If neither he nor the
freetype219 maintainer react, I will do it soon.
Yeah, I've been meaning to go ahead and release it, but I've been
slammed with Real
Am 09.11.2006 um 21:05 schrieb Martin Costabel:
It is from RangerRick's experimental tree, to be found buried in
the svn repository on finkproject.org. You can get it from websvn
at this address (plus the corresponging *.patch:
James Robinson wrote:
[]
Let me know if you want any more info.
%.acrux ~ fink list fink
Information about 5522 packages read in 1 seconds.
i fink 0.25.1-31 The Fink package manager
i fink-mirrors 0.25.1.2-1 Mirror infrastructure
i fink-prebinding 0.7.1-1002 Tools for enabling
- Original Message From: William Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]I wonder if this is something we should worry about, or whether weshould be like my grad student friend?I noticed rather few hadanything of substance to say, but there were references to fink beingmore cumbersome, the "unstable"
static and dynamic, maybe?
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006 19:24:02 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message
From: William Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wonder if this is something we should worry about, or
whether we
should be like my grad student friend? I noticed rather
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 9, 2006, at 11:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
static and dynamic, maybe?
or stable and testing, since that's pretty much exactly what they are...
- -chris zubrzycki
- - --
PGP public key: http://homepage.mac.com/beren/publickey.txt
ID:
static and dynamic, maybe?
or stable and testing, since that's pretty much exactly what they are...
stable, {latest,current,development,bleeding-edge}?
Even more than one non-stable tree might work, but that might incur more
work on the part of maintainers.
I've also heard from colleagues
On 11/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that the term unstable scares many people away from using the unstable tree. They think unstable means might blow up your system, when it really means changes several times a day. Sure, any new package version might have a bug, but
12 matches
Mail list logo
