Re: [Fink-devel] freetype219-shlibs-2.1.9-3

Am 09.11.2006 um 07:01 schrieb Martin Costabel: > Peter Dyballa wrote: >> Hello! >> To create xdvipdfmx from the XeTeX distribution (http:// >> scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&item_id=XeTeX&) >> we need a libfreetype2 with these two functions: >> _FT_GetFile_From_Mac_ATS_

Re: [Fink-devel] Compiling popt: Out of memory error.

Martin Costabel wanadoo.fr> writes: > > James Robinson wrote: > > On 2006-11-06 20:12:37 +, Martin Costabel >> wanadoo.fr> said: > [] > >> According to James Robinson on the bug tracker item #1572715, the > >> reason for this problem seems to be a bad interpretation of the > >> > >> Source

Re: [Fink-devel] fink vs. the alternatives

>Hi folks: Hello Bill. >Periodically, I see posted on other mailing lists or bulletin boards >a question like "should I use fink or Darwinports or ..."? I'm not >sure what it says about my state of mind, but I always read these and >come away somewhat disappointed, because fink often seems

Re: [Fink-devel] freetype219-shlibs-2.1.9-3

Peter Dyballa wrote: > Am 09.11.2006 um 07:01 schrieb Martin Costabel: [] >> For several months, I have been using Ben Reed's experimental >> version of freetype 2.2.1 that has these features. I think he could >> submit it to unstable, although perhaps not all problems with >> backward compat

Re: [Fink-devel] freetype219-shlibs-2.1.9-3

Peter Dyballa wrote: > > Am 09.11.2006 um 21:05 schrieb Martin Costabel: > >> It is from RangerRick's experimental tree, to be found buried in the >> svn repository on finkproject.org. You can get it from websvn at this >> address (plus the corresponging *.patch: >>

Re: [Fink-devel] freetype219-shlibs-2.1.9-3

Martin Costabel wrote: > I hope so. RR is kept in CC of this thread, in case he wants to submit > this version to the unstable repository. If neither he nor the > freetype219 maintainer react, I will do it soon. Yeah, I've been meaning to go ahead and release it, but I've been slammed with Rea

Re: [Fink-devel] freetype219-shlibs-2.1.9-3

Am 09.11.2006 um 21:05 schrieb Martin Costabel: > It is from RangerRick's experimental tree, to be found buried in > the svn repository on finkproject.org. You can get it from websvn > at this address (plus the corresponging *.patch: >

Re: [Fink-devel] Compiling popt: Out of memory error.

James Robinson wrote: [] > Let me know if you want any more info. > > %.acrux ~> fink list fink > Information about 5522 packages read in 1 seconds. > i fink 0.25.1-31 The Fink package manager > i fink-mirrors 0.25.1.2-1 Mirror infrastructure > i fink-prebinding 0.7.1-1002 Tools for enabling

Re: [Fink-devel] fink vs. the alternatives

- Original Message From: William Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>I wonder if this is something we should worry about, or whether we  should be like my grad student friend?  I noticed rather few had  anything of substance to say, but there were references to fink being  more cumbersome, the "unstab

Re: [Fink-devel] fink vs. the alternatives

"static" and "dynamic", maybe? On Thu, 9 Nov 2006 19:24:02 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > - Original Message >From: William Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I wonder if this is something we should worry about, or >whether we > should be like my grad student friend? I noti

Re: [Fink-devel] fink vs. the alternatives

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 9, 2006, at 11:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > "static" and "dynamic", maybe? or stable and testing, since that's pretty much exactly what they are... - -chris zubrzycki - - -- PGP public key: http://homepage.mac.com/beren/publickey.txt

Re: [Fink-devel] fink vs. the alternatives

> > "static" and "dynamic", maybe? > > or stable and testing, since that's pretty much exactly what they are... stable, {latest,current,development,bleeding-edge}? Even more than one non-stable tree might work, but that might incur more work on the part of maintainers. I've also heard from collea

Re: [Fink-devel] fink vs. the alternatives

On 11/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I believe that the term "unstable" scares many people away from using the unstable tree.  They think unstable means "might blow up your system", when it really means "changes several times a day".  Sure, any new package version might have a