Martin Costabel wrote:
> Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> []
>> So the symbol is still there on 10.5, but is private extern? That is,
>> indeed, what nmedit is supposed to do. There are other issues with
>> nmedit on Leopard (it refuses to strip global coalesced symbols -
>> whatever they are) that mean tha
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
[]
> So the symbol is still there on 10.5, but is private extern? That is,
> indeed, what nmedit is supposed to do. There are other issues with
> nmedit on Leopard (it refuses to strip global coalesced symbols -
> whatever they are) that mean that I will have to patch libtool.
Martin Costabel wrote:
> Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> []
>> Do not understand fully this argument.
>> I have exactly the same output from the above 'nm -m' command on 10.4;
>> so apparently _ up to what is visible from this output _ the result
>> of the nmedit command is the same on 10.4 and 10.5
It appears that the Apple c++ compiler on Intel has a bug which
causes the ov_fcn_handle.cc test case to segfault in octave. Likewise
the FSF g++ compiler from gcc42 causes the test_sparse.m testcase to
segfault on powerpc. The gcc43 snapshot compiler doesn't have this
problem. For now, the best
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Koen van der Drift wrote:
> xml-sax-pm
> xml-sax-expat-pm
>
> I used to maintain the second one (but it is set as 'none' now), not
> sure why the first one is also there. Maybe it only matches the first
> few characters?
well, it's matching *all* ve
On Dec 5, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> There are still some load issues on the server, but I'd like to put
> out
> a request to see how things stand up to a little actual load from
> users.
>
> Please let me know if you hit any i
Robert T Wyatt wrote:
> +1 Do to my infrequent participation I hesitate to help evaluate tracker
> packages, but if I had something to follow I'd be happy to test stuff
> and provide input.
Due-do. It's been a long couple of days:
http://ccwf.cc.utexas.edu/~robert/images/utc.gif
(2nd from left
John Ridgway wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I'm probably a month+ away from having Leopard going (I've asked for
>> it for Christmas and it's going to be a very busy December and January
>> for me), and I
Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
> Looks very cool! A few minor quibbles:
>
> * The 'Sort order' field seems meaningless. The only option is
> 'Descending', but the results are always sorted ascending by name
> anyhow. I'd suggest just scrapping the field, what's the point of
> sorting descending-by-name?
On 12/6/07, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
> > three dots "..." gave me the same full resultset… :-/
>
> Out of curiosity, what would you *expect* it to give you?
>
> =)
>
> I mean, it's basically equivalent to an empty query in the context of
> full-text search
Looks very cool! A few minor quibbles:
* The 'Sort order' field seems meaningless. The only option is
'Descending', but the results are always sorted ascending by name
anyhow. I'd suggest just scrapping the field, what's the point of
sorting descending-by-name?
* Could you add a way to search onl
On Dec 6, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'm probably a month+ away from having Leopard going (I've asked for
> it for Christmas and it's going to be a very busy December and January
> for me), and I don't foresee an Intel box, a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
> hmm… do you have some alphanumeric filter there?
>
> three dots "..." gave me the same full resultset… :-/
Out of curiosity, what would you *expect* it to give you?
=)
I mean, it's basically equivalent to an empty query i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm probably a month+ away from having Leopard going (I've asked for
it for Christmas and it's going to be a very busy December and January
for me), and I don't foresee an Intel box, and therefore the ability
for me to look at Intel-only issues, in the
Hello Martin,
On 06.12.2007, at 01:16, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Jürgen Lorenz Simon wrote:
>
> I just built xerces-c on a G5/10.4 and on an intel/10.5 without any
> problem. I have a suspicion:
>
> []
> []
>> c-2.7.0-1002/xerces-c-src_2_7_0/lib -lxerces-c
>> ld: Undefined symbols:
>> __ZN11xerc
hmm… do you have some alphanumeric filter there?
three dots "..." gave me the same full resultset… :-/
--
Alexey Zakhlestin
http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Pap
On 12/6/07, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
> > I entered "%%%" in the search field — it returned me everything… I
> > guess it is not what is supposed to happen… because none of those
> > results actually had '%' in their name…
> >
> > % and _ symbols should be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
> I entered "%%%" in the search field — it returned me everything… I
> guess it is not what is supposed to happen… because none of those
> results actually had '%' in their name…
>
> % and _ symbols should be escaped by slashe
I entered "%%%" in the search field — it returned me everything… I
guess it is not what is supposed to happen… because none of those
results actually had '%' in their name…
% and _ symbols should be escaped by slashes before querying
On 12/5/07, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEG
19 matches
Mail list logo