Jack Howarth wrote:
> Martin,
> Do you think that a single package (melina) merits a change
> in the gcc42 and gcc43 packaging?
Don't worry. I have already switched melina and my other packages that
used gcc42, to gcc43.
--
Martin
-
Martin,
Do you think that a single package (melina) merits a change
in the gcc42 and gcc43 packaging? I could move the symlinks
in %p/bin for gcc42 and gcc43 out into a gcc42-dev and
gcc43-dev package (allowing the gcc42 and gcc43 packages
to co-exist). Then packages would BuildDepends on gcc4X
Martin Costabel wrote:
> Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> []
>
>>I have forgotten to say that the update went fine on PPC/Intel OSX 10.5.2.
>
>
> My fault, I forgot that you said you had the error on 10.4.11/ppc. I get
> the same error there now, too. The Tiger version of ld apparently is
> less f
Jack Howarth wrote:
>The info files for melina, pgplot and r-base
> all contain incorrect Depends for gcc42. These packages
I can only speak for melina, but I can tell you that the Depends is not
"incorrect". Melina needs a fortran compiler at runtime, and it needs
the same one it was built
