Resending (again) as it didn't seem to make it to the list...
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 03:41:51PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> Can I get someone to look at
>
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1885674&group_id=17203&atid=414256
>
> ? I wanted to close it out a while
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 09:44:43AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Just tested the long-awaited 0.9.0 installer for 10.5/intel.
> The installation went smoothly, very fast. Good.
Wow! Binary installer! Awesome! :)
A huge thanks and congratulations to the people involved in putting this
together.
David R. Morrison wrote:
> Martin,
>
> Could you try updating to fink 0.27.14 by hand? If it works, I'll add
> that to the bindist.
OK, fink selfupdate-cvs worked with the fink-0.27.13-41 from the bin
installer (although execrably slow today...). This brought
fink-0.27.14-41, which built and
Martin,
Could you try updating to fink 0.27.14 by hand? If it works, I'll add
that to the bindist.
-- Dave
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 27, 2008, at 3:44 AM, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Just tested the long-awaited 0.9.0 installer for 10.5/intel.
> The installation went
Just tested the long-awaited 0.9.0 installer for 10.5/intel.
The installation went smoothly, very fast. Good.
Then: "fink selfupdate". I was expecting to be asked which selfupdate
method to use. Didn't happen:
> costabel% fink selfupdate
> curl --connect-timeout 30 -f -L -A 'fink/0.27.13' -O
>
