Daniel Macks wrote:
Remind me why:
BuildConflicts: bzip2-dev
is a good idea?
Not really:
costabel% fink selfupdate
[...]
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
Scanning package description files..
Information about 9314 packages read in 2 seconds.
The following
Dave,
Feel free to move over...
unstable/main/finkinfo/languages/gcc42.info
unstable/main/finkinfo/languages/gcc42.patch
unstable/main/finkinfo/languages/gcc43.info
unstable/main/finkinfo/languages/gcc43.patch
unstable/main/finkinfo/languages/gcc44-10.4.info
Dave,
I should have also added that you can delete
stable/main/finkinfo/languages/gcc4.info
stable/main/finkinfo/languages/gcc4.patch
unstable/main/finkinfo/languages/gcc4.info
unstable/main/finkinfo/languages/gcc4.patch
The gcc4.info package in unstable is a pre-release
of gcc 4.2 (packaged
The only reason I built against the system bzip2
was that I didn't want to be responsible for adding
a new dependency that might be circular in the
core packages. If you are certain that zip will
never be required before bzip2 is built then
remove the...
BuildConflicts: bzip2-dev
and a
I've looked through the sources for zip 3.0 and
unzip 6.0 and my initial impressions appear to be
borne out. They use a weird custom configure script
in concert with Makefile to find the system bzip2
library on MacOS X without providing an easy way
to redirect the the location of bzip2. We
I am looking for information on how to properly build and deploy a binary
package using fink. I've looked at the documentation and the FAQs, but am
still unsure of what constitutes a good fink binary package.
Thnks.
Saadat.
On 04/09/2009, at 21:11, Saadat wrote:
I am looking for information on how to properly build and deploy a
binary
package using fink. I've looked at the documentation and the FAQs,
but am
still unsure of what constitutes a good fink binary package.
Fink provides the infrastructure for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jack Howarth wrote:
Shouldn't the Snow Leopard information on the
finkproject home page be updated to tell folks
if they had Xquartz 2.3.3.2 installed on their
Leopard machine that a clean installation of
fink will be required after upgrading
On 04/09/2009, at 22:41, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
Shouldn't the Snow Leopard information on the
finkproject home page be updated to tell folks
if they had Xquartz 2.3.3.2 installed on their
Leopard machine that a clean installation of
fink will be required after
