Jack Howarth wrote:
> Martin,
> Regarding your question about how to get gfortran to accept the -arch
> option,
> it can't. That is an enhancement that Apple added to their gcc which wasn't
> (and is unlikely
> to ever be) ported to FSF gcc. The approach FSF gcc uses (which we have
> support
Martin,
Regarding your question about how to get gfortran to accept the -arch
option,
it can't. That is an enhancement that Apple added to their gcc which wasn't
(and is unlikely
to ever be) ported to FSF gcc. The approach FSF gcc uses (which we have
supported since
I assumed maintainership)
Regarding the list at http://wiki.finkproject.org/index.php/Fink:SnowLeopard,
the g95 package will almost certainly have to be left marked as Distribution
restricted to 10.4 and 10.5. The g95 author forked long ago from FSF gcc's
gfortran
code and still uses an ancient version of gcc for his ba
Hello, all.
As previously announced by David R. Morrison, the stable tree has been
pruned for Snow Leopard. Many packages aren't available and William G.
Scott has already posted a wish list. :)
I've gathered the last commit messages on the stable tree and I've
built up a page on our wiki t
I second the call for swig to be moved
from unstable to stable so that it will build
on 10.6. The pymol-py packaging currently moved
from unstable won't build on 10.6 without that.
I could variant pymol-py and use the system swig
for 10.6 but it seems silly to have to resort to
that.
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 02:39:43PM -0700, William G. Scott wrote:
> I'm trying to migrate coot to stable, but several dependencies are in
> unstable, so if there is any change of migrating these, I can verify
> they work:
>
> These include current or recent versions (see below) of:
>
> pygtk
Fixed.
-- Dave
On Sep 5, 2009, at 5:23 PM, William G. Scott wrote:
> Hi folks:
>
> I started a clean "stable" 64-bit for 10.6 for purposes of testing
> migration of some of my packages to stable.
>
> Although gcc44 is in stable, its dependency libmpfr1 is not, so gcc44
> won't build in stab
I'm trying to migrate coot to stable, but several dependencies are in
unstable, so if there is any change of migrating these, I can verify
they work:
These include current or recent versions (see below) of:
fftw,
swig,
pygtk2-gtk-py26
and
atk1
freetype219
glib2 (dev)
gtk+2
libffi
libglade2
Hi folks:
I started a clean "stable" 64-bit for 10.6 for purposes of testing
migration of some of my packages to stable.
Although gcc44 is in stable, its dependency libmpfr1 is not, so gcc44
won't build in stable.
HTH,
Bill
William G. Scott
Contact info:
http://chemistry.ucsc.edu/~
Daniel,
Actually if you look closely at the zip-3.0-1 and unzip-6.0-1
builds they never include a -I%p/include or -L%p/lib so we can
just drop the BuildConflicts entirely.
gzip -dc /sw/src/zip30.tgz | /sw/bin/tar -xf - --no-same-owner
--no-same-permissions
make -f unix/Makefile generic
sh un
If any issues arise from the updates into stable
from unstable that I've added, please cc me directly
if you post to the list. I'm a tad distracted at the
moment trying to get some recent major regressions on
x86_64-apple-darwin addressed in gcc trunk (gcc 4.5)...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 07:03:26PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>I've looked through the sources for zip 3.0 and
> unzip 6.0 and my initial impressions appear to be
> borne out. They use a weird custom configure script
> in concert with Makefile to find the system bzip2
> library on MacOS X witho
On Sep 5, 2009, at 6:33 AM, monipol wrote:
On 05/09/2009, at 03:34, Saadat wrote:
My application uses components, which have GPL2, GPL, BSD and MIT
licenses.
Looking at the packaging instructions, it seems that I would have to
have
one license under which the application is released. If I can
On 05/09/2009, at 03:34, Saadat wrote:
> I would like to make the application available through fink, i.e.
> "fink
> install myapp" should work.
As I said before (and now with pointers to further information), you
may:
a) Submit a package description to Fink. If it conforms to Fink's
policy
Saadat wrote:
> I would like to make the application available through fink, i.e. "fink
> install myapp" should work.
>
> My application uses components, which have GPL2, GPL, BSD and MIT
> licenses. Looking at the packaging instructions, it seems that I would
> have to have one license under w
Martin Costabel wrote:
[]
> (The last
> fasentencect is not an official xquartz declaration, but it is the
> logical conclusion from the currently available declarations.)
Read "fact" or "sentence", as you wish. Anyway, I think it is true :-)
--
Martin
-
monipol wrote:
> On 04/09/2009, at 22:41, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>> Jack Howarth wrote:
>>> Shouldn't the Snow Leopard information on the
>>> finkproject home page be updated to tell folks
>>> if they had Xquartz > 2.3.3.2 installed on their
>>> Leopard machine that a clean installation of
>>> fi
17 matches
Mail list logo
